Penalty u/s 78 of FA - GTA Service - the appellant was a dealer ...

Case Laws Service Tax

November 26, 2018

Penalty u/s 78 of FA - GTA Service - the appellant was a dealer and not a provider of output service - Appellant is liable to pay service tax under the reverse charge mechanism - Since there was a bonafide doubt, no penalty.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 78 of FA - GTA Service - the appellant was a dealer ...

Case Laws Service Tax

November 26, 2018

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 78 of FA - services received from abroad, but service tax not paid - even if the appellant pays service tax, they would be eligible for the credit...

Reduction of penalty u/s 78 of FA - non-payment of service tax - appellant has not recorded the said transactions in their specified records - Penalty reduced to 50% of...

Penalty u/s 78 of FA - Tax paid on being pointed out - The conduct of the appellant of prompt payment of Service Tax immediately after gaining knowledge about its...

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Refund of service tax paid on GTA services - service tax was paid directly by the provider of services whereas it was the liability of the recipient under reverse charge...

Penalty u/s 78 of the FA, 1994 - appellant had correctly advised not to challenged the invocation of the extended period of limitation for recovery of service tax though...

Services rendered by appellant classified as works contract services, attracting service tax liability. Appellant failed to obtain service tax registration and pay...

GTA service - Service Tax liability is on the person paying the freight - Service provider did not pay the freight and therefore there is no tax liability on their part - AT

Levy of penalty u/s 77 and 78 of FA - there was no suppression of fact with an intention to evade payment of tax, established in this case. Since the Appellant has...

Penalty u/s 76 and 78 of FA - continuous default in paying service tax - statute has provided for cases/situations where there is a possibility of payment of Service Tax....

Liability of service recipient to pay (reimburse) service tax to the server provider - SC

Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

Levy of penalty u/s 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - evasion of service tax - appellant collected service tax from the service receivers but failed to deposit the...

CENVAT Credit - input services - Irrespective of the person whether it is service recipient or service provider is liable to pay the service tax but so long the service...

GTA - transportation services rendered by other transporters as sub-contractors - Consignment note' for the transportation service, it is held that the Appellant is not...

Quick Updates: