Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessee had declared LTCG and had ...

Case Laws Income Tax

May 14, 2019

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessee had declared LTCG and had claimed it as exempt u/s 10(38) as it suffered STT but subsequently withdrew the claim - at the most it may be considered as an unsubstantiated or wrong claim but it cannot be held to be furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income or concealment of income - no penalty

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessee had declared LTCG and had ...

Case Laws Income Tax

May 14, 2019

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - surrendered undisclosed income during the search and seizure - assessee contented that income disclosed in the return U/s 139(1) though claimed...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Claim of exemption u/s 10(38) where no STT was paid - the assessee having not disclosed fully and truly all the material facts relevant to the...

Assessee's claim for exemption u/s 10(35) was rejected by CPC while processing return u/s 143(1)(a), which attained finality as assessee failed to challenge it before...

Setting off the long term capital loss arising on sale of shares not subject to STT against long term capital gain arising from sale of Shares subjected to STT exempt...

The ITAT Mumbai upheld the levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for bogus LTCG. Exemption u/s 10(38) denied as revised income declaration was not voluntary but in response to...

Bogus LTCG - exemption u/s.10(38) denied - the assessee submitted a letter withdrawing the LTCG claim u/s 10(38) and offered the same as income. Therefore, once the...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - it is a clear case of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income by the assessee when the assessee has claimed the long term capital gain exempt...

Penalty U/s. 271(1)(c) - claim of exemption u/s 10(38) whereas sale of shares was not through stock exchange - company adopted LIFO method where as AO adopted FIFO...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Denial of exemption of capital gains u/s 10(38) on account of sale of shares - The Tribunal also emphasized that the Revenue had failed...

Bogus LTCG - genuineness of transaction not proved - exemption u/s 10(38) - assessee failed to prove genuineness of transaction and long-term capital gain on sale of...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Penalty levied U/s. 271(1)(c) - false claim of exemption of LTCG u/s 10(38) - mere making of a claim, which is not sustainable in law, by itself, will not amount to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

Quick Updates: