Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - genuineness of the claim has neither ...

Case Laws Income Tax

June 5, 2019

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - genuineness of the claim has neither been disputed by the department nor the claimed expenses are false - the assessee has furnished all the relevant facts concerning the claim made by it in the return filed and disallowance u/s.40(a) was made for the reasons that assessee failed to deduct TDS thereon - no penalty

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - genuineness of the claim has neither ...

Case Laws Income Tax

June 5, 2019

You may also like:

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - deduction claimed u/s 80IA - there being no factual basis for establishing that the expenses needed to be allocated and the expenses so...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - provision for leave encashment - dispute was only relating to the year in which the said expenses are allowable and not about the very...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) claimed in the original return and later in the return filed in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act,...

Research and Development expenses (R&D Expenses) - Allowability of expenses u/s 35(2) - The expenses are not covered u/s 35(2) - The assessee has not claimed the same...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - At the highest, the case of the revenue was that even though the material was disclosed by the assessee but he had claimed...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee had sold a plot of land in respect of which deduction u/s 54B claimed - withdrawal of deduction u/s 54B - merely because the assessee...

Penalty u/s 271(1) - addition of wrong claim u/s 80IB made by assessee in the return & surrendered during scrutiny proceedings - such claim is solely based on the report...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed for excess deduction claimed u/s 10B. The assessee furnished all relevant facts for computing total income, and provided detailed...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Revenue expenditure or not - expenses on NPA’s - merely because the assessee has claimed the expenditure, which claim was not accepted or not...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The explanation given by the assessee for the depreciation claim, is neither bona-fide, nor substantiated - penalty confirmed - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bogus claim of deduction under Section 35CCA - penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was rightly imposed - HC

Quick Updates: