Power of CIT(A) to dismiss appeals ex-parte - penalty u/s ...

Case Laws Income Tax

June 6, 2019

Power of CIT(A) to dismiss appeals ex-parte - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Section 250(6) mandates the CIT(A) to decide the appeals on merits and not to dismiss them in default or for want of prosecution - even if the assessee failed to prosecute his appeals and to submit necessary explanation - remanded to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication

View Source

← Previous Next →

Power of CIT(A) to dismiss appeals ex-parte - penalty u/s ...

Case Laws Income Tax

June 6, 2019

You may also like:

Ex-parte order by CIT (Appeals) - Section 250(6) enjoins that the CIT(A) shall state the points for determination before it and the decision shall be rendered on such...

The Commercial Tax Tribunal cannot proceed to consider and decide an appeal ex parte in the absence of the revisionist/appellant, as it would violate principles of...

Rectification u/s 254 - Tribunal decided the appeal of the Revenue on merits and ex-parte - The proviso to Rule 25 deals with the situation where the Tribunal has passed...

Ex-parte order passed by CIT-A - Non speaking order - The exercise of the “right to be heard at the hearing of the appeal” by “the appellant, either in person or by an...

The ITAT Mumbai ruled on penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for estimation of income on bogus purchases. The tribunal held that penalty cannot be levied on additions made on an...

The appellate authority erred in deciding the appeal ex-parte in the absence of the appellant or their counsel. The statutory mandate requires the appellate authority to...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal observed that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dismissed the assessee's appeal ex-parte without deciding issues on merits,...

The ITAT Pune set aside an ex-parte order by the CIT(A) due to improper service of hearing notice. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal in limine for non-prosecution without...

Proceedings u/s.144 - NFAC has noted the assessee’s continuous non-appearance in the lower appellate proceedings before rejecting his contentions vide ex-parte order...

The assessee challenged the penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) for short credit of sale consideration received from the sale of copyrights and cable rights. The issue...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Appellants engaged in manufacturing dutiable goods and providing exempted trading services failed to maintain separate accounts for input services utilized in both...

The case involved a dispute over penalty imposition u/ss 271(1)(c) versus 271(1B) for additions related to estimated income from share trading transactions. The...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - undisclosed investment u/s 69A - ex parte assessment order - We have no hesitation in confirming the penalty levied under section...

Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

Quick Updates: