100% EOU - the petitioner could have obtained extension of the ...

Case Laws Customs

September 4, 2019

100% EOU - the petitioner could have obtained extension of the time limit not exceeding 5 years - It is well-settled that even a retrospective amendment will not take away the vested rights of the parties. The same logic and principle will apply in the case of accrued liability also - when liability has already accrued, the same cannot be washed away or effaced by a subsequent notification

View Source

← Previous Next →

100% EOU - the petitioner could have obtained extension of the ...

Case Laws Customs

September 4, 2019

You may also like:

Deduction u/s 80IC - Since in the present case the fact that the assessee had undertaken substantial expansion is not disputed, the assessee, we hold, is entitled to...

Denial of refund claim - Bar of limitation - Whether the time limit of one year has provided under Section 11B is applicable for refund under Rule 5 - Held Yes - time...

The case involves mis-declaration of imported goods to evade customs duties. The appellant declared goods as 100% Cotton fabrics to misuse duty exemption under DFRC...

Extension of time in Filing of annual return by Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs) - Circular

Extension of ADD - imports of soda ash - there cannot be a gap between expiry of original duties or extension of one year thereof under second proviso to Section 9A(5)...

Re-assessment - Time limitation for notices issued - period of limitation enhanced from 5 years to 6 years - Prospective or retrospective amendment - 5 year period...

Pronouncement of orders not within 90 days - Covid-19 epidemic - Even without the words “ordinarily”, in the light of the above analysis of the legal position, the...

Deduction u/s 80IC - if substantial expansion is undertaken, say, in 8th year by an assessee such an assessee would be entitled to 100% deduction for the first five...

The case pertains to the jurisdiction of impugned orders under the U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017, and the time limitation u/s 73 and Section 44 of the Act. The key points are:...

Regular Approval u/s 80G(5) - The High Court found that while the respondents had the authority to extend the time limit, there was no valid reason provided for the...

Refund - Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - 100% EOU - it is suggested that refund claim can be filed on quarterly basis in a calendar year i.e. not more than four...

Extension of period for issuance of show cause notice u/s 73 of GST Act, 2017 - Validity of N/N. 09/2023 - The Hich Court noted that the Notification extends the time...

The High Court interpreted the phrase "where it is possible to do so" u/s 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, ruling that it allows flexibility only in exceptional...

Extended benefit of exemption u/s 10A - assessee enjoyed the benefit of 5 years from 1993-94 to 1997-98 - amended provision came into force on 1-4-1999 - benefit of...

Index of Eight Core Industries (Base: 2004-05=100) , August 2011.

Quick Updates: