Passing such contrary orders, only seems to suggest that the ...

Case Laws Service Tax

October 3, 2019

Passing such contrary orders, only seems to suggest that the entire adjudication proceedings are a mere farce. The attitude of the Revenue even at the level of the Commissioner is that the demand has to be confirmed and the relief if any, the party has to obtain from Appellate Authorities. This attitude brings to a naught to claim of the State that it is business friendly.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Passing such contrary orders, only seems to suggest that the ...

Case Laws Service Tax

October 3, 2019

You may also like:

The adjudicating authority can proceed with adjudication u/s 16(1) of FEMA during the pendency of an appeal against an order passed u/s 37A(1). Section 37A deals with...

Appealable order before CIT(A) - scope of order passed on the basis of direction given u/s 263, revisionary proceedings - Therefore, for all purposes, the computation of...

Validity of order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 92CA without passing draft order of assessment - eligibility of assessee - once TPO passed order u/s 92CA, assessee is an...

Provisional attachment - power of competent authority to repeat the provisional attachment after period of one year - As the adjudication proceedings have begun, and the...

Clandestine removal - vanaspati - Seeking for keeping in abeyance the further proceeding pending in the court of the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Special...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Earlier, ITAT remanded the matter back requesting the AO to provide reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings. - AO must have...

Revision u/s 263 - The Pr. CIT while passing the order u/s 263 cannot remand the matter back to the AO for passing the fresh order as it will lead to the conclusion that...

Revision u/s 263 - period of limitation - We adopting a cautious but not a pedantic approach, though, refrain from restraining the A.O from proceeding with the...

Principles of Natural justice - late filing of return - intent to evade or not - it is the case of petitioner is that various aspects have not been dealt with or...

Validity of summary orders/adjudication orders - the summary of orders, adjudication orders and all subsequent orders issued by the department in all the writ...

Rectification order passed u/s.154 - Period of limitation - In the present case before us there is no controversy about first order or second order but order under...

Validity of TP order - Period of limitation - Computation period of 60 days given by the taxpayer cannot be faulted with on any ground because from 26.02.2022, the date...

Obligation to pass a draft assessment order u/s 144C (1) - Petitioner asserts that even in partial remand proceedings from the Tribunal, the Assessing Officer (A.O.) is...

Validity of assessment u/s 144C - Non passing draft Assessment Order - TP Adjustment - AO merely captioned the final Assessment Order as Draft Assessment Order along...

Validity of delayed adjudication of SCN - Inordinate delay of 13 years in adjudication of SCN - We fail to understand when the respondents could wait for 13 long years...

Quick Updates: