Initiation of CIRP - Time limitation - There is no averment that ...

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy

October 9, 2019

Initiation of CIRP - Time limitation - There is no averment that the winding up proceedings were initiated. No provision in the Code has been brought to our notice by which application under Section 7 of the Code cannot be filed where proceedings under SARFAESI 2002 are pending.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Initiation of CIRP - Time limitation - There is no averment that ...

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy

October 9, 2019

You may also like:

Initiation of CIRP - Period of limitation - It is now well settled that the provisions of the Limitation Act are applicable to proceedings under the IBC as far as may be...

Initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271C and the limitation period for levying such penalty. The key points are: The penalty proceedings were initiated on the date of...

Validity of Winding up order - Antrix, which initiated the proceedings for winding up, is neither a financial creditor nor an operational creditor nor a corporate...

Winding up petition - time limitation - recovery of dues - A suit for recovery based upon a cause of action that is within limitation cannot in any manner impact the...

Once a resolution plan is approved u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), only the debts specified in the resolution plan remain payable. This...

The High Court held that once a resolution plan is approved u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), only the debts specified in the resolution plan...

Time Limitation - CIRP process - A suit for recovery is a separate and independent proceeding distinct from the remedy of winding-up and therefore the contention of the...

Penalty proceedings under CGST Act cannot be initiated after State GST Authorities have initiated proceedings on the same subject matter. Once proceedings are initiated...

Proper officer - Jurisdiction of Initiate investigation proceedings by the Central GST and State GST authorities simultaneously - cross-empowerment - The Court found...

Excess stock found during survey at petitioner's business premises triggered initiation of proceedings u/s 130 of GST Act. Court held if excess stock is found,...

Initiation of CIRP - Maintainability of application filed u/s 9 of the Code - Respondent being a government company (PSU) is out of purview of the Code or not - The...

Initiation of CIRP - Period of limitation - It is clear that on the day of filing the petition U/S 7 of the Code, there was a subsisting liability on the corporate...

The court held that Section 6(2)(b) of the Act treats the empowered officers under the SGST/UGST Act at the central level to be at par and does not prescribe for...

Initiation of CIRP - Relevant date of default - The Tribunal noted the appellant’s arguments about defaults prior to the RBI’s COVID-19 moratorium guidelines but also...

Refund of amount which had been adjusted during CIRP by the Appellant Bank from Fixed Deposits - Once CIRP was initiated and Section 14 of IBC applied such adjustment by...

Quick Updates: