Whether the High Court ought to interfere, under Article 226/227 ...

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy

December 5, 2019

Whether the High Court ought to interfere, under Article 226/227 of the Constitution, with an Order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal in a proceeding under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, ignoring the availability of a statutory remedy of appeal to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal and if so, under what circumstances? - NCLT and NCLAT would not have jurisdiction to adjudicate upon disputes such as those arising under MMDR Act, 1957 - HC was justified to interfere.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Whether the High Court ought to interfere, under Article 226/227 ...

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy

December 5, 2019

You may also like:

Judicial orders of civil court are not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution; - Jurisdiction under Article 227 is distinct from...

Sale of property of the company to the third parties - oppression and mismanagement - it is quite clear that the even though the sales made in the years 2013 and 2014...

Private commercial transactions involving acquisition of shares in a life insurance company were challenged on allegations of fraudulent acts and undue profits. The...

Validity of reopening of assessment - Reason to believe - Pertinently, the question of going into the veracity and genuineness of material/evidence forming the opinion...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India or supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article...

Central Government constitutes additional Benches of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)

The single judge dismissed the writ petition; substance of the order is under Article 227 and no power under Article 226 of the Constitution has been exercised - the...

It cannot be hold that an advance ruling of the Authority can only be challenged under Article 136 of the Constitution before this Court and not under Articles 226...

Importantly, a contract for manufacture simpliciter is not a works contract under the definition provided under Section 2(k) - It is a settled law that the...

Oppression and Mismanagement - The appellants are critical of the Special Officer appointed by the learned National Company Law Tribunal (who was appointed to ensure...

Writ appeal against writ petition entertained by the Ld. Single Judge - private parties - mismanagement and oppression of majority shareholders - Material on record...

Impugned order by NCLT granting interim injunction against petitioners set aside for being non-speaking, unreasoned, cryptic, laconic without considering triple test for...

Arbitration Award - Maintainability of petition before the HC - availability of alternative remedy of appeal - Against the award made by the learned Arbitrator made...

Condonation of delay - There is no prohibition for this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution in exercising the extraordinary jurisdiction to condone the...

Condonation of delay of 5 months and 3 days in filing appeal before the Commissioner (appeals) - A litigant does not stand to benefit by resorting to delay. In fact he...

Quick Updates: