When the appeal was decided by the Tribunal through Annexure A ...

Case Laws Central Excise

December 26, 2019

When the appeal was decided by the Tribunal through Annexure A order, the decision was taken based on the law as it stood then. In a subsequent decision of the hon'ble Supreme Court the law was declared as otherwise, based on a change of opinion. Such a change of opinion of law cannot be taken as a 'mistake apparent on the face of the record' which could be rectified.

View Source

← Previous Next →

When the appeal was decided by the Tribunal through Annexure A ...

Case Laws Central Excise

December 26, 2019

You may also like:

Binding nature of Tribunal Order - Principle of “consistency” - Not only the Tribunal but all the Authorities subordinate to it are bound to follow and comply with the...

It is well settled in law that a decision of the court is only an authority for what it decides and not what can logically be deduced therefrom. It cannot be quoted for...

The CESTAT held that the revenue authorities cannot adopt an inconsistent stand in subsequent proceedings when the facts are identical, unless there is a change in law....

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the assessing officer against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, holding that no substantial question of law...

The High Court held that the reopening of the assessment based on a subsequent judgment that the transaction in question was amenable to tax was impermissible. Once an...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - doctrine of res judicata - principal of consistency - Consistency does not mean putting iron fetters on the subsequent decision making;...

Jurisdiction of Additional CIT - The Standing Counsel should understand that this Tribunal is not to decide the mercy petition but has to decide the issue before it in...

Legality of revision of order of Tribunal u/s 254 on ground of retrospective overruling - Judicial decision acts retrospectively. Judges do not make law they only...

Rectification application u/s 254 - Tribunal not followed the decision on the identical facts by the Coordinate Bench which is confirmed by this Court - The Court...

Burden to bear the GST amount - Arbitration award- supply of the elevators - The phrase “ex aecquo et bono” means according to equity and conscience. It empowers the...

The Appellate Tribunal adjudicated on the issue of addition of interest income and penalty u/s 271(1)(c). The assessee contended that the interest income from a Fixed...

Valuation of imported goods - aluminium scrap - enhancement of value - The Tribunal referred to a previous decision where it was asserted that the appellant had agreed...

Power of Tribunal when it disagree with earlier decision of Tribunal - there are only two methods to disagree is either the decision is per in-curium or the decision is...

All the decisions were actually brought to the notice of the adjudicating authority. The adjudicating authority has chosen to disregard them on the ground that the...

Hon. Minister Piyush Goyal briefing media about the decisions taken in the GST Council Meet, at a press conference in New Delhi

Quick Updates: