AO cannot occupy the armchair of the assessee and direct it to ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 26, 2019

AO cannot occupy the armchair of the assessee and direct it to make the payment of wages at particular rate. As such it was the wisdom of the assessee for making the payment of the wages at the particular rate which cannot be questioned by the AO.

View Source

← Previous Next →

AO cannot occupy the armchair of the assessee and direct it to ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 26, 2019

You may also like:

TP Adjustment - Impute interest on receivables - LIBOR + 200 basis point rate is most appropriate rate and hence, direct the AO/TPO to adopt LIBOR + 200 basis point for...

This circular clarifies the scope of regularization on an "as is" or "as is, where is" basis mentioned in previous GST circulars issued based on GST Council...

Appropriate rate for benchmarking - receivables from AEs - it would be most appropriate if the LIBOR rate is applied as most appropriate rate of interest for imputing...

Mere disallowance of expenses u/s 40A(3) would not invite penalty for concealing or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. Assessee disclosed all particulars...

CIT(A) determined profit at 5.47% on total purchases. Assessee produced sufficient evidence regarding purchases, movement of goods, GST payment on transportation,...

Estimation of profit - AO applying a profit rate of 20% on the contract receipt against the rate of profit declared by the appellant at 8.13% - CIT(A) directing the AO...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - non specification of charge - AO has miserably failed to specify in the notice issued under section 274 read with...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - merely on the basis of additions, AO would not ipso facto lead to the conclusion that the assessee has concealed the particulars of income...

The case pertains to the revision of an assessment order u/s 263 regarding the applicability of the higher tax rate u/s 115BBE on unexplained expenditure u/s 69C. The...

The ITAT Mumbai addressed errors in capital gain computation. The Assessee's claim of ₹ 859,680 was accepted over the AO's ₹ 791,221. An application u/s 154...

Deduction u/s 80IC - independent unit v/s extension of unit - the assessee has claimed wages expenses which were subject to PF, electricity expenses. Likewise, there was...

TDS u/s 194C - Non deduction of TDS on payments to shipping companies and CFS Agents - Addition u/s 40(a)(ia) - payments made by the assessee to shipping companies/CFS...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - addition were made u/s 69 and 69C - ld PCIT has stated that the AO has not applied the rate of tax as per section 115BBE, what he meant was...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the assessee is entitled to the concessional tax rate of 10% on royalty income u/s 115BBF, as the assessee had...

Assessee failed to declare Long Term Capital Loss (LTCL) on sale of shares of ECL and Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of shares of Saya in the return of income....

Quick Updates: