Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
VAT - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2020 Year 2020 This

Levy of penalty - The fact that the Assessee was not previously ...

Case Laws     VAT and Sales Tax

March 12, 2020

Levy of penalty - The fact that the Assessee was not previously registered and later on got registered upon inspection or survey by the Department is not relevant for the purpose of Section 12(3)(a) of the Act - Since the fact that the Assessee got himself registered and filed the return and paid the due tax thereon is not disputed, it is sufficient to set aside the penalty in question. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of penalty under section 272A(2)(k) - TDS return not filed within time - Since the levy of penalty is not mandatory in each and every case and depends upon facts of...

  2. Levy of penalty u/s. 221 - default the payment of TDS to the government - assessee in default - the Assessing Officer levied penalty at very exorbitant rate that 5% pm...

  3. Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

  4. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) involved an addition based on estimation by the Assessing Officer, which was later re-estimated by the CIT(A) to disallow 10% of the...

  5. The Appellate Tribunal considered the levy of penalty u/s 270A. The Assessing Officer (AO) imposed the penalty u/s 270A(9)(a) for misrepresentation of facts and...

  6. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - addition u/s 2(22)(e) - deemed dividend - While levying the penalty, the deeming provisions can be applied to a limited extent and instant...

  7. Penalty u/s 270A was imposed by disallowing 30% of indexed cost of development expenses concerning Long Term Capital Gain offered by the assessee due to failure to...

  8. The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalty was initiated u/s. 271DA instead of u/s. 271D, which led to confusion and violated the assessee's right to a fair hearing....

  9. Levy of penalty u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - No independent reasons have been given by the first appellate authority to confirm the penalty under Section 78 of the...

  10. Levy of penalty u/s 271AAB - surrender of additional income during search - assessee had himself admitted to the fact that there were discrepancies and unrecorded...

  11. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

  12. No doubt the discretion to levy the penalty or to drop the penalty proceedings is entirely the discretion of the appropriate authority who is authorized under the...

  13. Levy of penalty u/s 158BFA(2) - penalty has been levied on the amount of undisclosed income without providing any working of maximum and minimum penalty leviable - No penalty - AT

  14. The assessee had not offered short-term capital gain u/s 50 on the sale of a depreciable fixed asset as income in the return or during scrutiny proceedings. The issue...

  15. Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non compliance of notices u/s 142(1) - the AO was not having the present address of the assessee - when the notice issued u/s 142(1) was not...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates