Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - If AO accepted the revised return, ...

Case Laws Income Tax

March 16, 2020

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - If AO accepted the revised return, there was no question of making inadmissible claim of deduction u/s 10B in such revised return. In fact, there is no concealment or inaccurate furnishing of income in such revised return. - penalty levied by the AO u/s 271(1)(c) deleted - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - If AO accepted the revised return, ...

Case Laws Income Tax

March 16, 2020

You may also like:

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - A mere making of the claim, which is not sustainable in law, by itself, will not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars regarding the income...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

Rental income determination - assessee jointly owns 50% house property in Singapore with wife - offered 100% rental income for AY 2014-15 erroneously, rectified in...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - difference in original return of income and revised return - Had it been the intention of the assessee to make a full and true disclosure...

Penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) - revised return filed - assessee has adopted the recourse of avoiding litigation, therefore, revised the return to buy peace of mind - no...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee in this case has never revised its return during the period prescribed u/s 139(1) rather withdrew the claim during assessment...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) claimed in the original return and later in the return filed in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act,...

The preliminary assessment u/s 143(1) is limited to processing the return for arithmetical errors, incorrect expense claims, verifying audit reports, deductions, and...

Penalty being 300% by invoking Section 271(1)(c) - return was revised before completion of assessment - Revenue is not justified in imposing penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - HC

Validity of revised return filed vis-a-vis claims made thereunder - revised return treated as non-est - the appellant filed his original return otherwise than u/s 139(1)...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) r.w.s. 274 - additional income declared in the return filed in response to notice u/s 153A as compared to original returned filed u/s...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

Quick Updates: