Pronouncement of orders not within 90 days - Covid-19 epidemic - ...

Case Laws Income Tax

May 16, 2020

Pronouncement of orders not within 90 days - Covid-19 epidemic - Even without the words “ordinarily”, in the light of the above analysis of the legal position, the period during which lockout was in force is to excluded for the purpose of time limits set out in rule 34(5) of the Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963. Viewed thus, the exception, to 90-day time-limit for pronouncement of orders, inherent in rule 34(5)(c), with respect to the pronouncement of orders within ninety days, clearly comes into play in the present case.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Pronouncement of orders not within 90 days - Covid-19 epidemic - ...

Case Laws Income Tax

May 16, 2020

You may also like:

Pronouncement of orders within 90 days after the conclusion of hearing - Covid-19 epidemic - Worldwide lockdown - We are of the considered view that rather than taking a...

The notification GSR 383(E) dated 19.04.2018 amended the clause, which came into effect on the same date. The respondent Directorate had 90 days from 19.04.2018 to file...

The notification GSR 383(E) dated 19.04.2018 amended the relevant clause, which came into effect on the date of publication. Consequently, the Directorate had 90 days...

Cancellation of the IEC - EPCG Scheme - levy of penalty - the learned Judge while disposing the writ petition filed by the appellant, challenging the order of...

Provisional attachment order under Money Laundering Act challenged for being beyond 180 days. Court held that period from 15th March 2020 till 28th February 2022 must be...

The High Court held that the delay of 80 days in filing the Return of Income should be condoned as the petitioner faced genuine hardship due to valid reasons arising...

Validity of the orders passed by the first appellant u/s 92CA (3) on the ground of limitation as contemplated u/s 153 of the Act - Scope of the work "may" - The word...

Order u/s 254 (1) passed beyond the period of 90 days from the date of conclusions of its hearing - Since, in the present case, the order has been pronounced one day...

Penalty levied u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with documentary evidence requirements was challenged by the assessee, citing COVID-19 restrictions as a reasonable...

Validity of order of spcial bench of NCLT - Irregularity in publishing of Cause List in the prescribed manner - The petitioner got the certified copy of the order within...

SVLDRS - The court acknowledged that the petitioner failed to make the balance payment within the extended period due to financial constraints post-COVID-19. However, it...

Validity of time limitation for claiming input tax credit - claim to be made within 90 days from the date of purchase or before the end of the financial year whichever...

Delay in depositing TDS amount ranging from 31 to 214 days due to COVID-19 pandemic constituted reasonable and sufficient cause. As per High Court [2023 (11) TMI 447],...

Revocation of CBL License - 90 days from the date of issuance of SCN is when the noticee submits reply within 30 days and in a case like this, when the noticee has not...

Re-export of even after the expiry of the warehousing period - Due to COVID-19 pandemic, the appellants were unable to proceed with their construction project and clear...

Quick Updates: