Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2020 Year 2020 This

Penalty u/s.271D - there is no estopel against the statute and ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

December 5, 2020

Penalty u/s.271D - there is no estopel against the statute and therefore, it is open to the assessee to claim before the authorities that a particular item of income is not taxable despite having offered the same in its return of income or even having accepted the same as taxable before the authorities or even in the books of accounts - This appeal filed by the assessee against penalty u/s.271D of the Act for A.Y.2007-08 requires to be remanded back to the file of the ld. CIT(A) for denovo adjudication in accordance with law. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of penalty u/s 271D - Receipt of deposits in cash in contravention of provisions of section 269SS - The assessee explained before the authorities below that two of...

  2. Penalty u/s 271D - violation of provisions u/s 269SS - cash receipt claimed as advance against sales - recording of the satisfaction by the AO is sine qua non for...

  3. Penalty levied u/s 271D - assessee has availed cash loan in contravention of provision of section 269SS - Assessee has submitted that though the assessee has initially...

  4. The ITAT Delhi held that the levy of penalty u/s 271D without valid satisfaction for alleged violation u/s 269SS is not justified. The AO must record satisfaction in the...

  5. Penalty u/s 271D - accepting loan in cash - reasonable cause - the AO has neither doubted the impugned transaction nor any addition made in this behalf even under...

  6. The ITAT held that for penalty u/s 271D for contravention of section 269SS, recording satisfaction by AO is mandatory. Citing Jaya Laxmi Rice Mills case, it emphasized...

  7. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

  8. Penalty u/s 271D or 271E - Penalty u/s.271D or 271E of the Act is concerned, those are independent proceedings and having nothing to do with assessment proceedings or...

  9. Penalty u/s 271D - default u/s 269SS - assessee has taken loan from his father and paternal aunt, who are family members and such transactions would not attract penalty u/s 271D

  10. Penalty u/s. 271D - assessee has repaid loans/ deposits from various sister concerns through journal entries, i.e., otherwise than account payee cheques/draft - though...

  11. Penalty u/s 271D - loan amount obtained in cash from Directors in emergency - violation of provision of section 269SS - the assessee that on the different dates assessee...

  12. Deduction u/s 80IA - Onus is on the assessee to prove strictly that assessee fulfills all the parameters laid down by the statute for claiming the deduction. In the...

  13. Levy of penalty u/ss 271D and 271E was challenged - default u/ss 269SS and 269T - assessee received and repaid cash loans from directors and related concerns - assessee...

  14. Levy of penalties under various sections - The Appellate Tribunal, in a consolidated order, addressed several appeals concerning penalties imposed under various sections...

  15. Benefit of Amnesty Scheme - Penalty levied u/s 271D and 271E - When a specified sum is so provided as the penalty, such specified sum is the minimum penalty payable....

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates