Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2021 Year 2021 This

Levy of penalty u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - No independent ...

Case Laws     Service Tax

February 12, 2021

Levy of penalty u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - No independent reasons have been given by the first appellate authority to confirm the penalty under Section 78 of the Act. When the matter went before the Tribunal, no attempt has been made to examine the facts of the case and the Tribunal also was of the view that the assessee had separately collected the service tax and not remitted to the Department, but filed Nil return. This being contrary to facts, both the authorities and the Tribunal committed error in levying/confirming the penalty under Section 78 of the Act. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Even it would not be proper to penalize the appellant under Sections 76 and 78, when the first appellate authority waived the penalty under Section 77 itself - AT

  2. Levy of penalty - There are no reason why the said benefit cannot be extended to the penalty imposed under Section 76, since both the Sections are to be read along with...

  3. Clandestine manufacture and recovery of Central Excise Duty along with interest and penalty - suppression of facts and misrepresentation alleged against petitioner -...

  4. The court quashed the impugned orders rejecting the appeal as the appellate authority failed to assign any reasons, violating principles of natural justice. It is...

  5. Levy of penalty under Section 53(12)(a)(i) of the KVAT Act - The levy of penalty is not automatic, but is discretionary in nature. Therefore, the matters which have a...

  6. Levy of penalty - in case of confirmation of demand u/s 73(A) there is no application of Section 76 and 78 for imposition of penalty. Therefore, the adjudicating...

  7. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - As the penalty proceedings are distinct and independent to the quantum proceedings, in our considered view, penalty cannot be levied merely on...

  8. Levy of penalty u/s 78 - entire facts were available on record and on this there is no dispute; nor is there any contrary finding by the adjudicating authority. The...

  9. Finance Bill, 2015 - service tax - Substantial overall in levy of penalty u/s 76 and 78

  10. BOTH PENALTIES UNDER SECTION 76 & 78 CAN NOT BE LEVIED - Article

  11. Inasmuch as a penalty under Section 78 is being sustained, there is no justification for restoring the penalty under Section 76 as sought for by the department. However,...

  12. Penalty under Sections 77 and 78 - delayed payment of service tax - The statutory levies cannot be obviated for so long merely because the computer was down - levy of...

  13. Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

  14. Review of the assessment order - In absence of any such reason given by the Assessing Authority, showing the application of his own independent mind, we are of the...

  15. Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates