Levy of Penalty - Jurisdiction - diversion of imported material ...

Court Questions Penalty on Assessee Due to Insufficient Evidence of Material Diversion; Show Cause Notice Not Justified.

March 8, 2021

Case Laws Central Excise HC

Levy of Penalty - Jurisdiction - diversion of imported material or not - the assessee has not made any unconditional acceptance of any diversion - the so called letter issued by the assessee cannot be taken to be a case where the assessee accepted the fact that they have not utilized the raw materials for the purpose for which it was imported - the materials which were available cannot be a reason for issuance of the Show Cause Notice - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of Penalty - Jurisdiction - diversion of imported material ...

Court Questions Penalty on Assessee Due to Insufficient Evidence of Material Diversion; Show Cause Notice Not Justified.

March 8, 2021

Case Laws Central Excise HC

You may also like:

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the assessing officer against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, holding that no substantial question of law...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Seizure of tobacco and loss of the same due to file - Liability of central excise department - Whether the Trial Court has committed error of facts and law in passing...

Seizure of goods as smuggled into the country from Myanmar u/s 130 of the Customs Act, 1962. The burden of proof lies on the respondent u/s 123 to show that the seized...

The High Court considered the legality of a penalty imposed u/s 31(3) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, due to the want of Form 28B. The issue was whether the defendants...

The High Court held that for levying penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS, the Assessing Officer must record satisfaction that the provisions were violated....

Imported raw sesame seeds duty-free under Advance Authorization Scheme were allegedly diverted and sold in the local market instead of being used for export production...

The High Court quashed penalty u/s E-Way Bill violation, classifying goods as ODC due to speed without intent to evade tax. Relying on precedent, mens rea is essential...

The assessee university's application for registration u/s 10(23C)(vi) was rejected due to non-submission of audited accounts and failure to provide necessary...

The assessee challenged the penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) for short credit of sale consideration received from the sale of copyrights and cable rights. The issue...

Penalty u/s 270A was imposed by disallowing 30% of indexed cost of development expenses concerning Long Term Capital Gain offered by the assessee due to failure to...

The High Court correctly distinguished between the jurisdiction vested in every person or public office and the District Registrar in determining penalty on...

In this case, the High Court addressed the issue of a rejected refund claim due to being time-barred. The key determination was the relevant date for calculating the...

The assessee had not obtained and furnished the Audit Report from the Accountant within the due date. The Tribunal held that the levy of penalty u/s 271B is not...

The Calcutta High Court considered a case involving the clandestine removal of wire rods and the levy of a penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The...

Quick Updates: