Unexplained deposits - the CIT (A) has neither verified the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

March 9, 2021

Unexplained deposits - the CIT (A) has neither verified the evidence by herself nor has called for any remand report from the AO, but has summarily accepted the evidence filed by the assessee. The additional evidence filed by the assessee before the CIT (A) ought to have been verified by the AO. - Matter remanded back - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Unexplained deposits - the CIT (A) has neither verified the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

March 9, 2021

You may also like:

TP Adjustment - writ against DRP order - admission of additional documents and seek a remand report from the AO can only mean that the panel was of the view that further...

Cash deposit during demonetization period treated as unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - CIT(A) sustained addition u/s 69A based on lack of supporting evidence for cash...

Admissibility of appeals - grant of ITC - merely because certain documents may have been brought on record may not itself be sufficient to grant ITC - once claim had...

Exemption u/s 11 and 12 - assessee failed to file the Audit Report in Form 10B along with the Return of Income - None of the authorities had any occasion to verify Audit...

Admission of additional evidences u/r 46A - submitted first time before CIT(A) - The principles of natural justice are breached by learned CIT(A) by not calling for...

The ITAT considered an appeal regarding addition u/s 56(2)(viib) concerning the valuation of preference shares. The Assessee lacked a valuation report supporting the...

Unexplained cash credits u/s 68 and the applicability of Section 115BBE for taxing such additions. The key points are: The Assessing Officer (AO) issued notices u/s...

Assessee obtained loans from two corporate entities to purchase properties. AO treated these loans as unexplained cash credits u/s 68, relying solely on third-party...

Assessee engaged in business of commission agent (Aadatia) for agricultural products. AO made addition u/s 68 treating entire cash deposits in bank account as...

The assessing officer (AO) exceeded jurisdiction by reclassifying income as fees for technical services (FTS) instead of royalty, contrary to the limited remand order...

Exemption u/s 11 - registration u/s 12A denied merely on the basis of the Report of the Inspector - CIT(Exemption) was under duty to provide the copy of the report of...

The case pertains to the revision of an assessment order u/s 263 regarding the applicability of the higher tax rate u/s 115BBE on unexplained expenditure u/s 69C. The...

There is breach of Rule 46A(3) of Income-tax Rules, 1962 as no remand report was called by learned CIT(A) from AO and principles of natural justice is also breached as...

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the reopening of assessment u/s 147 due to the assessee providing bogus accommodation loss entries. The AO had reasons to believe in the...

The ITAT Ahmedabad considered the validity of reassessment proceedings based on borrowed satisfaction by the AO. The AO alleged non-independent application of mind by...

Quick Updates: