All the decisions were actually brought to the notice of the ...

May 5, 2021

Case Laws Service Tax HC

All the decisions were actually brought to the notice of the adjudicating authority. The adjudicating authority has chosen to disregard them on the ground that the revenue has filed appeal before the Supreme Court questioning some of the decisions. It is admitted that no interim order has been granted by the Supreme Court. It is well settled that merely because a matter is pending before the higher forum, such pendency will not take away the precedential value of the appealed decision. The adjudicating authority ought to have followed the Tribunal decisions which clearly support the stand of the petitioner. The aforesaid Tribunal decisions were binding on the authority. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

All the decisions were actually brought to the notice of the ...

May 5, 2021

Case Laws Service Tax HC

You may also like:

Jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) to adjudicate upon a closure notice issued prior to the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process...

Prayer for direction for placing the Settlement Proposal submitted by the Appellant before the CoC for consideration - CoC unanimously decided to reject the proposal...

The summary focuses on the rejection of cross-examination of DRI officers and a co-noticee by the competent authority. The main objective of cross-examination is to...

Benefit of DEPB - The clarification given by the DGFT will prevail over the allegation made by the Customs Department - In view of the change of circumstances by way of...

Classification dispute regarding Agro Shed Net manufactured by petitioner, whether classifiable as 'fabric' or plastic. Petitioner aggrieved that respondent-authority...

Initiation of CIRP - Requirement of issuance of notice to the creditors before admission of the application - Since the statutory Scheme does not contain any obligation...

Revised monetary limits for adjudication of show cause notices in Central Excise for commodities classified under Chapter 24 of Schedule IV (tobacco and tobacco...

Appointment of adjudicating authorities - only if similar show cause notices are issued to the same noticee by different adjudicating authorities, all such notices would...

Petitioner availed alternate remedy of filing substantive appeal against assessment order and notices issued u/ss 148A and 148 of the Act. Court held that if assessment...

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

Customs officials claim to have received illicit gratification - Clearance of restricted goods without following proper procedures - improper finalization of provisional...

Adjudicating Authority under FEMA - The High Court clarified that the Adjudicating Authority is not a persona designata, but a designation empowered by the Act. The...

The summary focuses on the approval of a resolution plan by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the limited scope of judicial review by the adjudicating authority. The...

The adjudicating authority can proceed with adjudication u/s 16(1) of FEMA during the pendency of an appeal against an order passed u/s 37A(1). Section 37A deals with...

While permitting withdrawal of Section 9 Application, Adjudicating Authority did not grant liberty to the Appellant to reapproach the Adjudicating Authority in the event...

Quick Updates: