Challenging the order of the settlement application - erroneous ...

July 14, 2021

Case Laws Service Tax HC

Challenging the order of the settlement application - erroneous demand of interest - This Court is of the opinion that the order passed by the Settlement Commission, pursuant to the admission made by the parties, need not be interfered with. However, if there is any error apparent on record or if there is any factual error regarding the admitted statements, the Settlement Commission is empowered to rectify such mistakes by following the procedures contemplated. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Challenging the order of the settlement application - erroneous ...

July 14, 2021

Case Laws Service Tax HC

You may also like:

Applicability: The waiver provisions u/s 128A apply to cases involving tax demands u/s 73 for financial years 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20, and cases involving...

Revision application u/s 264 to get refund - application by amalgamated company - order of CIT rejecting the application is erroneous - refund allowed u/s 237 - Tri

Rectification application - Validity of Garnishee Notices for recovery of tax - contention of the writ petitioners that the Garnishee Notices had come to be issued even...

Admission of Section 9 application filed by Operational Creditor - time limitation - Section 10A of IBC - The Tribunal found that apart from the lease rental of April...

Recovery of cash refund (erroneous refund) - area based exemption - duty on account of erroneous refund cannot be demanded on the allegation that the appellant was not a...

Stay of demand - payment of 20% of the outstanding demand - ITAT rejecting its application for stay on the recovery of demand during the pendency of appeal - The Delhi...

Stay of demand - guideline for stay of demand on payment of 20% of the disputed demand (earlier 15%) till the final disposal of the first appeal - Adjustment of future...

Taxpayers can file applications for waiver of interest or penalty u/s 128A of CGST Act for demands related to erroneous refunds, transitional credits, and tax periods...

The court examined whether the application filed by the State Bank of India against the personal guarantor u/s 95 was barred by limitation. It was held that even if no...

Various aspects related to the waiver of interest or penalty or both u/s 128A of the CGST Act. It clarifies eligibility criteria, application process, payment...

Validity of Adjusting Disputed Tax Demand Against Refunds Without Considering Stay Application - The High court found this action arbitrary and unfair, emphasizing that...

Initiation of CIRP - NCLT returned the application of the Financial Creditor instead of adjudicating on the Company petition - the Appellant has issued a demand notice...

This case pertains to the precedence and priority of consideration between an application filed u/s 54(C) and Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)...

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

AO failed to conduct proper inquiries regarding genuineness of loan transactions for property acquisition. Bank statements revealed assessee lacked funds, payments made...

Quick Updates: