Appeal before the CIT(A) against the draft order - It is only ...

Case Laws Income Tax

October 16, 2021

Appeal before the CIT(A) against the draft order - It is only the appeal filed by the assessee against the order u/s 144C(3) passed by the AO on 23.01.2020 that an effective and legally tenable appeal would call for decision. In our considered opinion, the ld. CIT(A) took an unimpeachable view in treating the appeal against the draft order as ‘defective’ and thus ‘not maintainable’.- AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Appeal before the CIT(A) against the draft order - It is only ...

Case Laws Income Tax

October 16, 2021

You may also like:

AO had no jurisdiction to frame the final assessment order on 27.01.2020 u/s. 144(3) of the Act, since he was divested of jurisdiction to pass final order between...

Validity of assessment order - The limitation for passing of such assessment order is four years from the end of the year containing the period to which the return...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Earlier, ITAT remanded the matter back requesting the AO to provide reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings. - AO must have...

Assessment framed without issuing mandatory notice u/s 143(2) by jurisdictional officer. Assessee filed return with Range-1(1), notice u/s 143(2) issued by ITO,...

Circular No. 36/2010-Customs dated 23.09.2010 issued under the Customs Act, 1962, specifically para 3(a), was struck down as ultra vires Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the...

Validity of assessment order passed u/s 153(1) - Period of limitation - In this case, since, the Assessing Officer cannot invoke jurisdiction u/s.144C(1) and pass draft...

The respondent, engaged in selling medicines with GSTIN 24AFKPG7000FIZZ, failed to pass on the benefit of GST rate reduction from 28% to 18% on the product "Eclat Serum...

Charge to income tax in respect of a house property - deemed income - The words “where the property is let” in sections 23(1)(b) and 23(1)(c), thus, represents a state...

Condonation of delay of 813 days in filing appeal - relevant date - In the present case the said order was passed by original adjudicating authority on 23.11.2020. The...

The ITAT held that the property was actually leased out during the relevant period, rejecting the AO/CIT(A)'s view based on suspicion. The law requires evidence, not...

Order passed by the AO u/s 143 (3) read with section 144C (1) titling it as “Draft Assessment Order” - AO while passing the impugned order, issued the demand notice u/s...

Levy of penalty - when the petitioner is not entitled to claim concessional rate of tax under section 3% of the TNGST Act, they are liable to pay penalty under section...

Deduction of interest u/s 23(3) being let out property - Rent received from mother, co-owner of property - no evidence furnished to prove actual occupation by mother on...

Provisional attachment - Expiry of 80 days mandatory period for confirmation of the provisional attachment u/s 5 of PMLA - Applicability of decision of Supreme Court for...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) examined the issue of merger of intimation u/s 143(1) and scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. The case...

Quick Updates: