Penalty levied u/s 271G - Assessee has failed to maintain the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

February 24, 2022

Penalty levied u/s 271G - Assessee has failed to maintain the information as per Rule 10D (1) (d), (g), (h) and (m) of Income Tax Rules - ‘reaso-nable cause’ under section 273B - assessee has a belief that such information is not required as well as not available, therefore , the assessee has ‘reasonable cause’ under section 273B of the Act for not maintaining the same. For failure as envisaged subject to penalty u/s 271G, if such failure is because of reasonable cause, no penalty can be levied. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty levied u/s 271G - Assessee has failed to maintain the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

February 24, 2022

You may also like:

Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(b) - assessee failed to give reasons for non-compliance of statutory notice u/s. 142(1) - till the disposal of appeal by the CIT(A) the assessee...

Penalty levied under 271(1)(c) - The revenue has tried to make out a case that since the addition was made pursuant to information from sales tax department, this...

Penalty u/s 271G – Failure to maintain documents and accounts being audited - AO should have initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271AA/271BA – the penalty levied u/s 271G...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

This case deals with the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, imposed for disallowance of losses on forex derivatives treated as speculative losses and...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied by the Assessing Officer solely based on the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission withdrawing immunity from penalty and...

MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Even if some discrepancies were found during the survey resulting in surrender of income by the assessee, once the assessee has declared...

Quick Updates: