Profiteering - purchase of flat in the Respondent's project ...

Case Laws GST

May 16, 2022

Profiteering - purchase of flat in the Respondent's project Heritage Max - allegation is that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of ITC - This benefit was required to be passed on to the recipients, however, the same was not done by the Respondent. Thus, Section 171 of the CGST, 2017 has been contravened by the Respondent, in as much as the additional benefit of ITC @4.81% of the base price received by the Respondent during the period 01.07.2017 to 30.06.2019, has not been passed on by the Respondent to 390 recipients including the Applicant no. 1. - NAPA

View Source

← Previous Next →

Profiteering - purchase of flat in the Respondent's project ...

Case Laws GST

May 16, 2022

You may also like:

Profiteering - purchase of Flats - allegation that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by him by way of commensurate reduction...

Profiteering - purchase of Flat - allegation is that the benefit of input tax credit had not been passed on - project was not under execution before coming into force of...

Profiteering - purchase of Flat no. A-802 in Respondent’s project “Azea Botanica” - allegation that benefit of reduction in the rate of GST not passed on - contravention...

Profiteering - supply of purchase of Flat - it is established that there had been no additional benefit of ITC to the Respondent and hence he was not required to pass on...

Profiteering - Construction services - allegation is that the benefit of ITC not passed to customers/flat buyers/recipients, by way of commensurate reduction in the...

Profiteering - purchase of flats - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the commensurate benefit of ITC to him - post-GST, the Respondent has been...

Profiteering - purchased a flat in the Respondent's project - allegation is that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of...

Profiteering - construction service supplied by the Respondent - post-GST, the Respondent has been benefited from additional ITC to the tune of 8.18% [11.74% (-) 3.56%]...

Profiteering - purchase of flat in Migsun Wynn - allegation of benefit of Input Tax Credit has not be passed on - The Respondent has benefited from the additional ITC to...

Profiteering - purchase of flat - the Respondent has not reduced the basic price of his flats by 0.14% in case of the above Project due to additional benefit of ITC...

Profiteering - purchase of a flat in the Respondent’s project “Vedantam” - allegation that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit which had...

Profiteering - purchase of Flat - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate reduction in...

Profiteering - construction service supplied by the Respondent - It is established that there had been no additional benefit of ITC to the Respondent and hence he is not...

Profiteering - purchase of flat - The present investigation has been conducted up to 31.12.2018 only. However, the Respondent has not obtained the Completion Certificate...

Profiteering - purchase of flat - The present investigation has been conducted up to 31.12.2018 only. However, the Respondent has not obtained the Completion Certificate...

Quick Updates: