Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2022 Year 2022 This

Revision u/s 263 - an order which is erroneous and prejudicial ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

May 18, 2022

Revision u/s 263 - an order which is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue - When all the evidences relating to commission/brokerage paid by assessee both to domestic as well as overseas agents are available on record, what more evidences are required to be furnished by the assessee is beyond comprehension. When the facts on record reveal that the Assessing Officer has made proper enquiry on the issues, on which limited scrutiny was directed, by merely referring to Explanation 2(a) to section 263 of the Act, the assessment order cannot be held to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue by making a general observation that proper enquiry, which the Assessing Officer ought to have made was not made. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The phrase prejudicial to the interest of revenue has to be read in conjunction with an erroneous order passed by the A.O. Every loss of...

  2. Exemption granted on Invalid F-Form – Invocation of revision jurisdiction – KGST - If there was error resulting in revenue losing tax, it would be prejudicial to...

  3. Revision u/s 263 - Every loss of revenue as a consequence of an order of AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, for example, when an...

  4. Revision u/s 263 - valuation of closing stock, non increasing of closing stock by proportionate other direct expenses - The alleged under valuation of closing stock is a...

  5. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - An incorrect assumption of the fact or an incorrect application of law will satisfy the requirement of the order being erroneous. The phrase...

  6. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Total power subsidy and TUF subsidy were wrongly declared by the assessee - When AO adopted one of the courses permissible in law and it has...

  7. Revision u/s 263 - phrase ‘prejudicial to the interest of the revenue’ - every loss of revenue as a consequence of an order of AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the...

  8. Revision u.s 263 - assessment order passed pursuant to the revisionary order has resulted in reduction of tax liability - not prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue...

  9. Revision u/s 263 - any loss of revenue as a consequence of an order passed by the Assessing Officer cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of revenue - AT

  10. Validity of Revision u/s 263 - An order which is prejudicial to revenue even if no Tax Loss - The High Court found that the AO's assessment did not adequately address...

  11. AO failed to conduct proper inquiries regarding genuineness of loan transactions for property acquisition. Bank statements revealed assessee lacked funds, payments made...

  12. The Commissioner's invocation of Section 263 for revision of the assessment order was unjustified as the twin conditions of the order being erroneous and prejudicial to...

  13. Revision u/s 263 - The expression prejudicial to the interest of the revenue is of wide import and is not confined to merely loss of tax. - The term erroneous means a...

  14. Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue - There was a failure on the part of the AO to make such enquiry in order to ascertain the nature of the expenses whether...

  15. Addition of interest on interest free loans advanced by assessee Company to sister concerns/related parties disallowed. Onus on assessee to prove commercial expediency...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates