Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2022 Year 2022 This

Validity of Reassessment proceedings u/s 147 - There was no ...


Reassessment u/s 147 invalid; assessee disclosed all material facts, making reopening legally impermissible. Full compliance proven.

June 24, 2022

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Validity of Reassessment proceedings u/s 147 - There was no failure to disclose material facts and failure to place a version favourable to the Revenue cannot be a reason to reopen the assessment in the light of the undisputed factual material referred by us extensively it is apparent that the re-opening was fully impermissible in law. The facts which are taken from the Auditor’s report, computation of income and return filed itself would indicate that the assessee had disclosed what was relevant and necessary for the purpose of making assessment. The assessee did not hold back any document nor failed to supply any information. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. HC quashed reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 after expiry of 4-year limitation period. Court found no failure by assessee to disclose material facts...

  2. The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal against the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond the four-year period. The Assessing Officer failed to record a finding that the...

  3. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as Assessing Officer (AO) failed to record that assessee did not disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for...

  4. The High Court held that the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Revenue were invalid due to the absence of any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose...

  5. The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment after four years and the addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act. It held that the original assessment was...

  6. HC dismissed Revenue's appeal challenging reopening of assessment u/s 147. The court found no valid grounds for reassessment as there was no failure by assessee to...

  7. Reopening of assessment after expiry of four years due to deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) was found invalid. The Assessing Officer (AO) failed to establish that the...

  8. The High Court held that the jurisdictional facts necessary to invoke Section 147 for reassessment were absent. The reassessment was initiated after the four-year...

  9. The ITAT Nagpur considered the validity of reassessment proceedings u/s 147. The AO issued notice beyond four years alleging capital gain on "Sale of Vehicles" escaped...

  10. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The High Court noted that the extended period of six years for reassessment could only be invoked under specific circumstances, one of...

  11. Validity of Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The Tribunal emphasized the principle that for reassessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, the onus is on the...

  12. Assessment completed u/s 143(3) accepting assessee's return, which included export incentive and foreign exchange fluctuation as other business income. Subsequently,...

  13. HC quashed reassessment notices and order finding them invalid under Section 147 of Income Tax Act. Notices issued after four years were without fresh material...

  14. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The writ-applicant has claimed deduction under Section 35(1)(ii) of the Act and not under Section 80GGA of the Act. This fact is also...

  15. Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - In the instant case the primary facts were already disclosed in the Notes to Accounts filed along with the balance-sheet...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates