Deletion of penalty - Tribunal erred in deleting the penalty ...

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax

July 15, 2022

Deletion of penalty - Tribunal erred in deleting the penalty imposable on the dealer under Section 42(5) of the OVAT Act, particularly since it came to the conclusion that the levy of tax on the uncollected VAT amount by the dealer was not excusable and upholding the orders of the STO and the JCST in that regard. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Deletion of penalty - Tribunal erred in deleting the penalty ...

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax

July 15, 2022

You may also like:

Correctness of erasure of credit already availed by prospective invalidation of eligibility for retention of credit that would subject those services already procured...

The Tribunal reduced the redemption fine and penalty for importing old clothing. Referring to a previous case, it upheld confiscation due to non-compliance but decreased...

PIL - taking away the earlier vested powers to make best judgment assessment - Deletion of the provisions of Section 29(5) from the Goa Value Added Tax Act, 2005 - The...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowances in the quantum assessment order - whether any concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars proved? - Tribunal directs...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of registration u/s 80G(5)(iii). The provisional registration was questioned due to a delay in applying for regular...

Misdeclaration of imported polished marble slabs as unpolished slabs. Excess quantity found during physical verification. Customs duty demanded along with interest and...

Difference between assessed income and returned income arose due to inadvertent error in taking opening written down value (WDV) at book value instead of WDV under...

The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalty was initiated u/s. 271DA instead of u/s. 271D, which led to confusion and violated the assessee's right to a fair hearing....

The Appellate Tribunal considered the levy of penalty u/s 270A. The Assessing Officer (AO) imposed the penalty u/s 270A(9)(a) for misrepresentation of facts and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied on additional income voluntarily offered in the statement recorded u/s 132(4). However, no reference was made to corroborative...

Quantum of penalty - Tribunal erred in reducing the amount of penalty - Tribunal, failed to take into consideration the law laid down in the case of Dharamendra Textile...

Deletion of Penalty u/s 271AAA - the assessee had paid tax along with interest on undisclosed income admitted during the course of search - penalty deleted - AT

The ITAT Mumbai considered a case involving a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal found the...

The assessee failed to deduct tax on professional fees paid to various non-residents. The Assessing Officer (AO) held that the fees were liable to tax in India under the...

Prosecution proceedings against the Auditor of the company - The High Court has materially erred in holding that on resignation of auditors – BSR & Deloitte and on...

Quick Updates: