Profiteering - purchase of flats - it is alleged that the ...

Case Laws GST

July 16, 2022

Profiteering - purchase of flats - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the commensurate benefit of ITC to him - post-GST, the Respondent has been benefited from additional ITC to the tune of 5.40% (6.67%-1.27%) of his turnover and the same was required to be passed on to the Applicant No. 1 and the other homebuyers/shop buyers/customers. The Authority determines the amount profiteered by the Respondent for the Project Arihant Anchal Phase I, during the period 1.07.2017 to 30.09.2019 as Rs. 1,78,32,984/-. - NAPA

View Source

← Previous Next →

Profiteering - purchase of flats - it is alleged that the ...

Case Laws GST

July 16, 2022

You may also like:

Profiteering - purchase of Flat - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate reduction in...

Profiteering - purchase of Flats - allegation that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by him by way of commensurate reduction...

Profiteering - construction service - Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate reduction in the prices - the ITC,...

Profiteering - purchase of Duplex Row House - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of ITC although he had charged GST @12% w.e.f. 01.07.2017...

Profiteering - purchase of Flats - it is alleged that Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by way of commensurate reduction in the...

Profiteering - Construction services - allegation is that the benefit of ITC not passed to customers/flat buyers/recipients, by way of commensurate reduction in the...

Profiteering - purchase of flats / shops - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of ITC to him by way of commensurate reduction in prices and...

Profiteering - purchase of a flat - the Respondent has not availed any benefit of CENVAT or ITC in the pre and post GST era and hence, there was no additional benefit...

Profiteering - construction services - The registration and approval of the projects and receipt of the payments had taken place in the post-GST regime and hence, there...

Profiteering - purchase of flat - whether there was any additional benefit of ITC with the introduction of GST availed by the Respondent or not. - This case does not...

Profiteering - construction service supplied by the Respondent - post-GST, the Respondent has been benefited from additional ITC to the tune of 8.18% [11.74% (-) 3.56%]...

Profiteering - purchase of Flat - Respondent shall reduce the prices to be realized from the buyers of the flats commensurate with the benefit of ITC received by him....

Anti-profiteering - if the benefit of ITC, which was not available earlier, was made available to the Respondent in the post GST period, it was incumbent on the...

Profiteering - purchase of Flat no. A-802 in Respondent’s project “Azea Botanica” - allegation that benefit of reduction in the rate of GST not passed on - contravention...

Profiteering - supply of purchase of Flat - it is established that there had been no additional benefit of ITC to the Respondent and hence he was not required to pass on...

Quick Updates: