Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
IBC - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2022 Year 2022 This

Scope of pronouncing of judgement - The law does not permit that ...

Case Laws     Insolvency and Bankruptcy

September 5, 2022

Scope of pronouncing of judgement - The law does not permit that the case is heard by one entity and the order is pronounced by another who has not heard the case at all. In such circumstances, the question posed is hereby answered in favour of the Appellant and it is held that the order dated 10.01.2018, having been passed by a bench in which one of the member was not a member of the bench who had heard the matter at the time when it was reserved, is patently illegal and void ab-initio. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Benami transactions - matter was heard by one authority and the judgment was pronounced by another authority - A writ is maintainable when there is a right. In the...

  2. Bench Reconstitution and Order Pronouncement - Whether an order reserved by a bench could be pronounced by a reconstituted bench without considering a subsequent...

  3. Procedure for assessment - scope of e-Assessment Scheme - A link for personal hearing shall be sent to the petitioner and the petitioner shall be heard within a period...

  4. Validity of order for levy of penalty - Principles of natural justice - The provision, that is, Section 75(4) of the Act, has mandated that, only an opportunity of...

  5. Law for trial of the cross cases - Raid - In the present controversy, two different criminal appeals were being heard and decided against two different judgments based...

  6. Prayer for condonation of delay in filing the Appeal - Dismissal of section 9 application - The NCLAT observed that the NCLT order clearly indicated the dates of hearing...

  7. Violation of the principles of natural justice - The petitioners asserted that since an adverse decision was made against them without a personal hearing, it was in...

  8. The petitioner contested a demand raised against them u/s 74 of the GST Act for a substantial amount, claiming that the order was passed without affording them an...

  9. Condonation of delay of 13 days in filing the Appeals - The present is a case where Appellant cannot be blamed for not applying the certified copy of the Order dated...

  10. Penalty levied u/s. 272A (1)(c) - non compliance with summons issued under section 131(1A) - ignorance of law is certainly no excuse for a default committed but, at the...

  11. The High Court ruled that security interests over assets of a corporate debtor to secure amounts due under a judgment or decree must give way to the provisions of the...

  12. Violation of principles of natural justice - non-grant of opportunity of hearing - last hearing was virtual hearing granted only to main noticee with respect to only one...

  13. Violation of the scheme of faceless assessment u/s 144B - The argument of the respondent/Revenue that personal hearing would be allowed only in such cases which involve...

  14. The High Court found a violation of the principles of natural justice due to the Assessing Authority's denial of an oral hearing opportunity. The court held that even if...

  15. Best judgement assessment - There appears to be divergents views insofar as the question as to whether the consumption of electricity can constitute the sole basis for...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates