Restoration of penalty - The Tribunal is justified in reversing ...

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax

November 3, 2022

Restoration of penalty - The Tribunal is justified in reversing the order of the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) as the mandatory provision under section 46(3) of the Act, specifically sub clause (e), declaration was not made by the petitioner to the commercial department to make them aware of such import to the state. The contention that the delivery note and self-declaration were available with the consignment is not enough to show that all the documents necessary for the movement of goods from one state to another as per prescribed under section 46 of the Act is complied. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Restoration of penalty - The Tribunal is justified in reversing ...

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax

November 3, 2022

You may also like:

Penalty proceedings u/s 270A - Applicable rate of penalty - The Appellate Tribunal noted that while the penalty notice cited under-reporting of income, the AO imposed...

The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalty was initiated u/s. 271DA instead of u/s. 271D, which led to confusion and violated the assessee's right to a fair hearing....

The Appellate Tribunal considered the levy of penalty u/s 270A. The Assessing Officer (AO) imposed the penalty u/s 270A(9)(a) for misrepresentation of facts and...

The case involved a challenge to the imposition of penalties and confiscation of goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalties...

Restoration of name of the company in the Register of Companies - there was no situation to justify the restoration of name of the Company - It is true that this...

Seeking restoration of petition, which was dismissed for non prosecution - The appellate tribunal acknowledges the assignment agreement between Bank of Baroda and the...

The Appellate Tribunal held that despite the addition u/s 69B of the Income Tax Act being justified, the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) cannot be levied due to ambiguity...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Assessee did not disclose non-eligibility...

Levy of penalty for abetting in mis-declaration of imported goods - Revocation of Courier License - The tribunal ruled that penalty under this section could only be...

Smuggling - Prohibited goods - confiscation of cigarettes containers concealed in HDPE granules - Penalty u/s 112 (a) &(b) and 114AA - The Appellate Tribunal upheld the...

Block assessment - Penalty u/s 158BFA - whether mandatory or discretionary - HC

If there is no mens rea, no mandatory penalty u/s 11AC - SC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - loss on sale of machinery - The Assessee contested the penalty, arguing that the omission of adding the loss on the sale of machinery to the...

Levy of penalties under various sections - The Appellate Tribunal, in a consolidated order, addressed several appeals concerning penalties imposed under various sections...

Quantum of mandatory deposit - whether an appellant has to pay 10% mandatory deposit over and above the mandatory deposit of 7.5% of the duty liability/penalties - Held...

Quick Updates: