Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2022 Year 2022 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when facts are disclosed in a return and ...

November 8, 2022

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when facts are disclosed in a return and are misstated, the raising of a legal plea of the exemption cannot make the return a false return within the meaning of Section 43(1). - IT has not committed any error while deleting the penalty - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

  2. Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

  3. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) r.w.s. 274 - additional income declared in the return filed in response to notice u/s 153A as compared to original returned filed u/s...

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed despite the assessee withdrawing the exemption claim u/s 10(38) for Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) on sale of penny stocks and offering...

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Explanation is bonafide is, we find, supported by the fact that during assessment proceedings the assessee, realizing his mistake even before...

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) - Unexplained Expenditure on Stamp Duty and Registration Charges made out of Undisclosed Income - There was no dishonest intent of the assessee...

  7. Penalty U/s 271(1)(c) - penalty proceedings are distinguished and separate and assessee can raise fresh plea in the penalty proceedings, which has been done in this case - AT

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - non specification of charge - new plea before the authorities below - In this case in hand, there is no such plea...

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income was declared in survey u/s 133A - date of filing of return u/s 139(1) had not expired - The fact of “concealment of income” and...

  10. Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - If AO accepted the revised return, there was no question of making inadmissible claim of deduction u/s 10B in such revised return. In fact,...

  11. Penalty u/s 271 (1)(c) - When interest income itself is not disclosed, there is no question of holding that all the facts relating to the interest income and material to...

  12. Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

  13. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee filed return of income in response to notice u/s 148 - No difference between returned income and assessed income - Assessee voluntarily...

  14. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - survey u/s 133A was carried out much prior of date of filing of return u/s 139(1) - amount admitted in survey has offered in return - When the...

  15. Penalty being 300% by invoking Section 271(1)(c) - return was revised before completion of assessment - Revenue is not justified in imposing penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - HC

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates