Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2023 Year 2023 This

Revision u/s 263 - The expression prejudicial to the interest of ...


Section 263: Erroneous Order by Assessing Officer Deemed Prejudicial to Revenue Interests, Beyond Tax Loss.

January 25, 2023

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Revision u/s 263 - The expression prejudicial to the interest of the revenue is of wide import and is not confined to merely loss of tax. - The term erroneous means a wrong/incorrect decision deviating from law. This expression postulates an error which makes an order unsustainable in law. Therefore, we hold that order passed by the Assessing Officer is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Section 263 revision - Unexplained income u/s 69A read with Section 115BBE - Cash seized shown as 'income from other sources' - Whether to be treated as unexplained...

  2. Revision u/s 263 - Every loss of revenue as a consequence of an order of AO cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, for example, when an...

  3. The Commissioner's invocation of Section 263 for revision of the assessment order was unjustified as the twin conditions of the order being erroneous and prejudicial to...

  4. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The phrase prejudicial to the interest of revenue has to be read in conjunction with an erroneous order passed by the A.O. Every loss of...

  5. Revision u/s 263 - When the provision contained under Section 92CA(4) of the Act makes it mandatory upon the Assessing Officer to compute the total income of the...

  6. The assessee's case was selected for limited scrutiny under CASS. The PCIT observed that the assessee, along with two co-owners, had purchased an immovable property...

  7. Revision u/s 263 - any loss of revenue as a consequence of an order passed by the Assessing Officer cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of revenue - AT

  8. Revision u/s 263 - valuation of closing stock, non increasing of closing stock by proportionate other direct expenses - The alleged under valuation of closing stock is a...

  9. The assessee, a university, claimed exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiab) for the relevant assessment year, which was accepted by the Assessing Officer (AO) after considering the...

  10. Validity of Revision u/s 263 - An order which is prejudicial to revenue even if no Tax Loss - The High Court found that the AO's assessment did not adequately address...

  11. Assessee received funds from four parties, which were not considered by the Assessing Officer (AO) during assessment proceedings u/s 147 read with Section 144. The...

  12. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Total power subsidy and TUF subsidy were wrongly declared by the assessee - When AO adopted one of the courses permissible in law and it has...

  13. The assessment order was passed without verifying the allowability of the cost of improvement as per Section 55(1)(b)(2), rendering it erroneous and prejudicial to...

  14. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Jurisdiction exercised by ld PCIT under section 263 of the Act is not in accordance with law. PCIT has selected the item (share capital and...

  15. Revision u/s 263 - assessment order as contrary to the draft assessment order - The remedy against unjust disallowances, on merits, lies in the appellate process and not...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates