Refund of pre-deposit - ITAT on 21.10.2014 passed remand order - ...

Case Laws Income Tax

February 23, 2023

Refund of pre-deposit - ITAT on 21.10.2014 passed remand order - the authorities were required to pass fresh assessment by 31.03.2017 - But, order was not passed by that time - In the present case, admittedly, no assessment order has been passed nor any assessment order could be passed, the same having been barred by the provisions of Section 153(1)(a)(iii). - Respondents are directed to refund the excess amount deposited by the petitioner after deducting tax liability qua depreciation disallowance which stands admitted by the petitioner before Tribunal - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund of pre-deposit - ITAT on 21.10.2014 passed remand order - ...

Case Laws Income Tax

February 23, 2023

You may also like:

Failure to file Form 10/10B before due date prescribed u/s 139(1) cannot be fatal to deny exemption u/s 11(2), especially when Form 10/10B was available on record when...

Lok Sabha passes the Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2014

The case pertains to the interpretation of amended provisions of Sections 35F and 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding eligibility for interest on pre-deposit...

Default u/s 201(1)/1A - period of limitation - limitation period was substituted from four years to six years for passing orders where TDS Statement had not been filed....

Withholding of refund - seeking release of refund - Legislature was conscious of the fact that the power conferred to withhold refund in Section 21 is akin to exercising...

Assessment u/s 144C - it is for the revenue to devise its own means and ways to correct the software and pass the final assessment order in accordance with the law. In...

Validity of orders under sec 201(1)/201(1A) - period of limitation - the limitation period for the financial year 2009- 10 relevant to assessment year 2010-11 expires on...

Violation of principles of natural justice - petitioner was unaware of the impugned order due to notices being hosted on GST Common Portal, resulting in unawareness for...

The Delhi High Court examined the validity of an order passed u/s 92CA and jurisdiction to pass an assessment order post-limitation period. The court held that once the...

The High Court set aside the impugned order dated 18.04.2024 passed by the 1st Respondent due to violation of principles of natural justice. The Petitioner was not aware...

Revision u/s 263 - The Pr. CIT while passing the order u/s 263 cannot remand the matter back to the AO for passing the fresh order as it will lead to the conclusion that...

Validity of Assessment passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B - order was passed prior to the expiration of deadline prescribed for preferring a response -...

Refund claim of amount deposited during investigation - the appellant is entitled to refund with interest under Section 35 FF, for which no limitation is applicable. The...

Order passed before the time prescribed for filing the reply - faceless assessment scheme - it is evident that the impugned order has been passed with pre-set mind. In...

Refund of TDS - applications for condonation of delay in filing returns claiming refund - Looking to the pecuniary jurisdiction, it clearly transpires that the Assessing...

Quick Updates: