Refund - Doctrine of unjust enrichment - It is on record that ...

Case Laws Service Tax

June 12, 2023

Refund - Doctrine of unjust enrichment - It is on record that the amounts were deducted from their bills and the client had forced the Appellant to make the remittance to the Government. In such a case, when it is clear that no amount was recovered from the client and this amount has been remitted by way of GAR-7 Challans, there is no possibility of any unjust enrichment accruing to the Appellant, if refund claim is sanctioned. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund - Doctrine of unjust enrichment - It is on record that ...

Case Laws Service Tax

June 12, 2023

You may also like:

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

Refund – doctrine of unjust enrichment would not apply to fine and penalty - AT

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

The appellant sought refund of countervailing duty (CVD) paid while importing goods declared as 'Natural gum in raw form' through Bills of Entry filed during 2011-2014....

Refund claim - Unjust enrichment - barring an amount of ₹ 3 lakhs, the appellant themselves were admitting that the remaining amount has been recovered from their...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Initially claim filed without challenging the self-assessed Bills of Entry - During the appeal process, the appellant sought to amend...

Refund - principles of unjust enrichment - the unjust enrichment is not applicable even when the refund amount is claimed as expenses in the Profit and Loss Account.

Refund claim - Cess - unjust enrichment - The amount realized from the foreign buyer was only FOB value - the refund of cess is not hit by unjust enrichment

The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

Refund – unjust enrichment – Merely because the interest amount was not shown as recoverable amount from the customers, clause of unjust enrichment cannot be attracted - AT

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Pre deposit made by VODAFONE shall not be subject to the doctrine of unjust enrichment

Unjust-enrichment - Refund allowed but directed to be deposited in the Consumer Welfare Fund of India - o the amount deposited during investigation, basing - The...

Refund - unjust enrichment - excise duty has not been claimed from the buyer of the goods and the same has been reflected in “Excise Duty Refund Receivable Account” -...

CESTAT NEW DELHI addressed unjust enrichment in a refund claim. The appellant sought a refund of Rs. 1,23,70,024 u/s the Tribunal's order. The appellant failed to prove...

Quick Updates: