Penalty u/s 271FA - non-compliance with the provisions of ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 21, 2023

Penalty u/s 271FA - non-compliance with the provisions of Section 285BA(1)(b) - non filing of a return in time - The respondents had specifically considered the contention raised by the petitioner and had held that the reasons stated by the petitioner do not constitute a reasonable cause to excuse their delay of 525 days in submitting the returns. It is also clear that though the provision permits the imposition of Rs.500/- per day as penalty only Rs.100/- per day has been inflicted. - Petition dismissed - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271FA - non-compliance with the provisions of ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 21, 2023

You may also like:

Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

The case involved denial of exemption u/s 11 due to late filing of return. The department argued return must be filed u/s 139(1) to claim exemption u/s 11. An amendment...

Penalty u/s.271AAB - Belated filing of regular return after search - Penalty cannot be levied u/s.271AAB of the Act, in respect of income disclosed in regular return of...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) r.w.s. 274 - additional income declared in the return filed in response to notice u/s 153A as compared to original returned filed u/s...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

Processing of invalid return u/s 143(1) - Denial of exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) - non-filing of ITR-V within 120 days made the assessee’s return as ‘invalid’ being...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Capital gain on sale of property - Allegation of the AO that, return of income has not been filed voluntarily - There was a reasonable...

The case involves penalty imposition u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with statutory notices issued u/ss 143(2) and 142(1). Assessee explained non-compliance due to a...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

Deduction u/s 54(2) – The date of filing the return u/s.139 of the Act has wide scope - The return can be filed u/s.139(1) or u/s.139(4) of the Act - Both the returns...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal considered whether an assessee can claim deduction under Chapter VI-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the first time in the return...

Validity of revised return filed vis-a-vis claims made thereunder - revised return treated as non-est - the appellant filed his original return otherwise than u/s 139(1)...

Penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) - non-compliance of notice issued u/s 142(1) - The inaction of the AO on the various letters filed by the assessee which enable the assessee to...

Penalty u/s 271F - assessee could not file the return of income because of preoccupation of the employment - there was a refund due, non filing of return of income...

Quick Updates: