Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - Since the Tribunal deleted the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

March 15, 2013

Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - Since the Tribunal deleted the addition and ordered expunging the initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1C) no reason to interfere with the finding of the Tribunal. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - Since the Tribunal deleted the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

March 15, 2013

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

Penalty levied u/ss 271(1)(c) and 271AAA for unexplained investment and addition made by adopting net profit as per the books of accounts at 12.85% on the suppressed...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) - The Tribunal noted that in a previous round of proceedings, a penalty under section 271(1)(b) of...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the penalty imposed u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with notices u/s 142(1) was not legally valid. The Assessing Officer failed to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - An order in the name of dead person - The Appellate Tribunal acknowledged that the penalty order was indeed issued in the name of a deceased...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - combined order of penalty for additions made vide order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. u/s 153A and u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 - AO required to initiate two...

The ITAT Mumbai ruled on penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for estimation of income on bogus purchases. The tribunal held that penalty cannot be levied on additions made on an...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) related to the addition of closing stock. The AO levied penalty on an addition u/s 36(1)(iii) that...

The CIT(A) partly allowed and restricted the addition on account of commission expenses at 0.25% as compared to 2% adopted by the Assessing Officer. The coordinate bench...

Addition u/s 69A - Addition of cash deposits made by the assessee during the demonetization period - The Tribunal examined the legality of the assessment order, the...

Assessment against an entity that had ceased to exist prior to the initiation of proceedings. The effect of a change in name was considered a curable defect u/s 292B, as...

Quick Updates: