Validity of Penalty u/s 271D and u/s 271E - Penalty proceeding ...

February 6, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Validity of Penalty u/s 271D and u/s 271E - Penalty proceeding as independent of the assessment proceeding - absence of satisfaction recorded in the reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s 144 r.w.s. 144B - The tribunal, following the Judgement of Supreme Court, confirmed the order of CIT(A) for deleting the penalty on account of no satisfaction recorded by the Ld. AO in the reassessment order u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s. 144B.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of Penalty u/s 271D and u/s 271E - Penalty proceeding ...

February 6, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271D or 271E - Penalty u/s.271D or 271E of the Act is concerned, those are independent proceedings and having nothing to do with assessment proceedings or...

Levy of penalties u/s 271D and 271E for the violation of sections 269SS and 269T, respectively - The Tribunal, after reviewing precedents from the Supreme Court and...

Penalty u/s 271D / 271E - violation of provisions of Sec.269SS and 269T - basis of presumption u/s 132(4A) - Period of limitation - The Tribunal found that the penalty...

The case pertains to penalty proceedings u/s 271D for violating Section 269SS and Section 271E of the Income Tax Act. The assessee received Rs. 18 lakh from a trustee...

Penalty u/s.271D & 271E - Period of limitation for imposing penalty u/s 275(1)(c) - he discussion by the AO in the assessment order and making reference to the Addl. CIT...

The case involved a challenge to penalty orders u/ss 271D and 271E before the Appellate Tribunal. The issue revolved around the reassessment proceedings being quashed,...

The ITAT held that for penalty u/s 271D for contravention of section 269SS, recording satisfaction by AO is mandatory. Citing Jaya Laxmi Rice Mills case, it emphasized...

Penalty u/s 271E - contravention of the provisions of Section 269T in the preceding assessment year - no proceedings pending before the Ld. AO qua the assessee for A.Y....

The ITAT Delhi held that the levy of penalty u/s 271D without valid satisfaction for alleged violation u/s 269SS is not justified. The AO must record satisfaction in the...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - ‘loan given” was believed to be undisclosed income of assessee - penalty u/s 271D and 271E - the “original-conclusion” was not faulty...

Penalty u/s 271 - validity of assessment proceedings can be looked into during the penalty proceedings even though the assessment itself has not been challenged by the assessee.

Penalty u/s 271D - violation of provisions u/s 269SS - cash receipt claimed as advance against sales - recording of the satisfaction by the AO is sine qua non for...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - just because no explanation has been offered by the assessee during the penalty proceedings the Ld. AO cannot automatically proceed to levy...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - As the penalty proceedings are distinct and independent to the quantum proceedings, in our considered view, penalty cannot be levied merely on...

Levy of penalties under various sections - The Appellate Tribunal, in a consolidated order, addressed several appeals concerning penalties imposed under various sections...

Quick Updates: