Penalty u/s 271D / 271E - violation of provisions of Sec.269SS ...

Case Laws Income Tax

February 23, 2024

Penalty u/s 271D / 271E - violation of provisions of Sec.269SS and 269T - basis of presumption u/s 132(4A) - Period of limitation - The Tribunal found that the penalty proceedings were not validly initiated due to the lack of satisfaction recorded in the assessment order regarding the violation of provisions of Sec.269SS. - It determined that the delay in moving the proposal for penalty proceedings after the conclusion of assessment proceedings was in violation of the CBDT Circular.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271D / 271E - violation of provisions of Sec.269SS ...

Case Laws Income Tax

February 23, 2024

You may also like:

Violation of the provisions of Sections 269SS and 269T - scope of the term "loan" and "deposit" - Penalty u/s 271D and 271E - amount received on account of share...

AO initiated the penalty u/s 271E for violation of sec. 269TT, but levied penalty u/s 271D for violation of the provisions of sec. 269SS. From this conduct of the AO, it...

Penalty u/s 271D - violation of provisions u/s 269SS - cash receipt claimed as advance against sales - recording of the satisfaction by the AO is sine qua non for...

Violation of section 269SS and 269T - cheque discounting business - The assessee had to discount the cheque for cash - There was no question of levying any penalty under...

The High Court held that for levying penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS, the Assessing Officer must record satisfaction that the provisions were violated....

Penalty u/s 271D & 271E - default committed in violation of section 269SS & 269T - Reliance on search proceeding documents - Transactions being mere book entries -...

Penalty u/s 271D & 271E - allegation of cash loan having been taken/repaid - The ITAT underscored the principle that penalties under Sections 271D and 271E for...

Penalties levied u/ss 271D and 271E were challenged. The assessee was found to have violated Sections 269SS and 269T. However, there was no concrete finding that the...

Penalty imposed u/s 271D and 271E - the availing and re–payment of loan through book entries was prior to 12th June 2012. Therefore non–compliance to the provisions of...

Violate the provisions of section 269SS and 269T – share application money - penalty u/s 271D and 271E is not automatic - if there is bonafide belief, no penalty u/s...

Levy of penalty u/ss 271D and 271E was challenged - default u/ss 269SS and 269T - assessee received and repaid cash loans from directors and related concerns - assessee...

Penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS was challenged. ITAT held that where assessee received sale consideration for immovable property in cash exceeding Rs....

Addition u/s 68 - Violation of provisions of section 269SS - unexplained cash deposit - Violation of provisions of section 269SS of the I.T.Act calls for penalty u/s...

Penalty u/s. 271E - violation of the provisions of Section 269T - Repayment of monthly instalment in cash to Tata Finance Corporation - as the assessee had not only...

Levy of penalties u/s 271D and 271E for the violation of sections 269SS and 269T, respectively - The Tribunal, after reviewing precedents from the Supreme Court and...

Quick Updates: