Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2024 Year 2024 This

Smuggling of gold - Imposition of penalties u/s 112 - The ...

Case Laws     Customs

March 9, 2024

Smuggling of gold - Imposition of penalties u/s 112 - The appellants were intercepted along with their luggage, which was found to contain smuggled gold bars. However, the appellants claimed they were unaware of the contents of the bags and that they were innocently carrying them. - The penalties imposed on the appellants set aside by the Tribunal, as they were found to be innocent of any involvement in the smuggling of gold.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of penalty u/s 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act 1962 - smuggling of Gold activity - reliability of statements - The appellant cannot come within the ambit of Section...

  2. Smuggling - Absolute confiscation of three gold bars and one small piece of remelted gold - Penalty u/s 112(a) and (b)(i) of Customs Act - The Tribunal noted that the...

  3. Imposition of penalty - section 112(b) of Customs Act - smuggling - diamonds - The active role of these Appellant, do not justify imposition of heavy penalty under...

  4. Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

  5. Levy of penalty u/s 112 (b) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Smuggling - gold biscuits of foreign origin - demand merely on the basis of the statements of the employees of the...

  6. 10kg of gold consisting of 10 gold bars, with 7 bars bearing foreign markings and 3 bars without markings, was seized along with cash from an employee of the appellant....

  7. Levy of penalty - allegation for abatement in smuggling of Gold - the activity of facilitating the financing of fund has been turned by the Ld. Commissioner into...

  8. Appellant proved ownership of gold bars through valid invoices, discharging initial onus. Revenue failed to establish invoices unrelated to seized gold, lacking inquiry...

  9. CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

  10. The case involved penalties u/ss 112(a) and 112(b) of the Customs Act for smuggling foreign gold. The tribunal held that statements without cross-examination are...

  11. The case involves the levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 on the appellant for smuggling foreign origin cigarettes. The appellant, a freight forwarder,...

  12. Seizure of Gold Bars - Confiscation - Penalty u/s 112(b) - The case involves the interception of the Appellant carrying 17 pieces of gold of foreign origin in Kolkata....

  13. Levy of penalty u/s 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act 1962 - petitioner has any role in the smuggling of Gold activity or not - Appellant is the financer of the importer - It...

  14. Quantum of penalty u/s 112(b) of the Customs Act - Smuggling - Gold Jewellery - Role of the petitioner in the act of smuggling the gold and currency notes is quite...

  15. Imposition of penalty - Smuggling - Gold bars of foreign origin - illegally imported goods - CESTAT held that, once the two Appellants disputed the fact of recovery of...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates