Levy of penalties u/s 271D and 271E for the violation of ...

Case Laws Income Tax

March 20, 2024

Levy of penalties u/s 271D and 271E for the violation of sections 269SS and 269T, respectively - The Tribunal, after reviewing precedents from the Supreme Court and various High Courts, emphasized that recording satisfaction in the assessment order regarding the initiation of penalty proceedings is mandatory. It was found that the AO had not recorded such satisfaction, rendering the penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E invalid. - Regarding period of limitation, the Tribunal noted that the reference for initiating penalty proceedings made by the AO to the Additional Commissioner was beyond the statutory limitation period. Therefore, the penalties imposed were considered time-barred and legally unsustainable.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalties u/s 271D and 271E for the violation of ...

Case Laws Income Tax

March 20, 2024

You may also like:

Violation of section 269SS and 269T - cheque discounting business - The assessee had to discount the cheque for cash - There was no question of levying any penalty under...

Violation of the provisions of Sections 269SS and 269T - scope of the term "loan" and "deposit" - Penalty u/s 271D and 271E - amount received on account of share...

Penalties levied u/ss 271D and 271E were challenged. The assessee was found to have violated Sections 269SS and 269T. However, there was no concrete finding that the...

Penalty u/s 271D / 271E - violation of provisions of Sec.269SS and 269T - basis of presumption u/s 132(4A) - Period of limitation - The Tribunal found that the penalty...

Levy of penalty u/ss 271D and 271E was challenged - default u/ss 269SS and 269T - assessee received and repaid cash loans from directors and related concerns - assessee...

Levy of penalties under various sections - The Appellate Tribunal, in a consolidated order, addressed several appeals concerning penalties imposed under various sections...

Penalty u/s 271D & 271E - default committed in violation of section 269SS & 269T - Reliance on search proceeding documents - Transactions being mere book entries -...

Penalty u/s 271D & 271E - allegation of cash loan having been taken/repaid - The ITAT underscored the principle that penalties under Sections 271D and 271E for...

The case involved a challenge to penalty orders u/ss 271D and 271E before the Appellate Tribunal. The issue revolved around the reassessment proceedings being quashed,...

The High Court held that for levying penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS, the Assessing Officer must record satisfaction that the provisions were violated....

AO initiated the penalty u/s 271E for violation of sec. 269TT, but levied penalty u/s 271D for violation of the provisions of sec. 269SS. From this conduct of the AO, it...

Penalty levied u/s 271D and 271E - accepting deposits by way of journal entries - assessee had accepted/paid loans in contravention of provision of section 269SS/269T -...

Penalty imposed u/s 271D & 271E - default u/s 269SS & 269T - CIT(A) deleted the penalty holding that general entries leading to assignment of debt does not attract...

Penalty imposed u/s 271D and 271E - the availing and re–payment of loan through book entries was prior to 12th June 2012. Therefore non–compliance to the provisions of...

The case pertains to penalty proceedings u/s 271D for violating Section 269SS and Section 271E of the Income Tax Act. The assessee received Rs. 18 lakh from a trustee...

Quick Updates: