Revisional jurisdiction u/s 264 - Application u/s 264 rejected ...

Case Laws Income Tax

March 22, 2024

Revisional jurisdiction u/s 264 - Application u/s 264 rejected as intimation u/s 143(1) of the Act is not an order amenable to revisional jurisdiction u/s 264 - The court ruled that intimation under Section 143(1) is amenable to revisional jurisdiction under Section 264 of the Act. This was based on precedent in "Diwaker Tripathi v. Principal Commissioner of Income tax – 17 & Ors.", which allowed for such revision.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revisional jurisdiction u/s 264 - Application u/s 264 rejected ...

Case Laws Income Tax

March 22, 2024

You may also like:

Right to file an appeal before CIT(A) where the application for revision u/s 264 rejected by the CIT - Notwithstanding unsuccessful effort of the assessee in the...

Claim of refund - Revision before the Commissioner u/s 264 in favor of assessee, against in intimation u/s 143(1) - the intimation under Section 143(1) is regarded as an...

Revision u/s 264 - penalty u/s 270A imposed - waiver of penalty u/s 270AA - The very fact that the indications were made that the matter fall within (a) and (c),...

Jurisdiction to entertain petitioner’s Revision application u/s 264 - The Court referenced Section 143(1)(A) and Section 120 of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing that CPC...

The High Court held that the intimation u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act falls within the ambit of 'any orders' envisaged u/s 264, making revision maintainable against...

Revision application u/s 264 to get refund - application by amalgamated company - order of CIT rejecting the application is erroneous - refund allowed u/s 237 - Tri

Revision u/s 264 against intimation/order u/s 143(1) - an intimation passed u/s 143(1) is regarded as an ‘order’ for the purpose of Section 264 - hence revision petition...

The ITAT held that an assessee's appeal is maintainable even if the alternative remedy u/s 264 has been availed. Relying on the Madras High Court's decision in CIT vs. D....

Addition in an intimation order u/s 143(1) - AO/CPC jurisdiction to make an adjustment in an Intimation Order u/s. 143(1) - No intimation given to the assessee of such...

Condonation of delay - revision u/s 264 - as the order u/s 143(1) came to be passed within this one year itself, writ petitioner had taken the first step to have income...

Rejection application for Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - Rejection on the ground the assessee has filing an appeal u/s 246 which was rejected by the CIT(A) due...

Revision petition u/s 264 - the revision application was filed seven years later. By no stretch of imagination, such long period can be ignored. The petitioner simply,...

The ITAT upheld the validity of adjustments made in the intimation u/s 143(1) regarding the addition of payment of employees' contribution to PF and ESIC beyond the due...

Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - an order/ intimation passed u/s 143(1) passed by the AO is equally an order, which can be questioned and be made subject matter...

Revision of other orders u/s 264 - petitioners sought to expressly withdraw the revision petition filed u/s 264 - application was pending for decision - Thus by not...

Quick Updates: