Validity of demand with penalty u/s 73 of CGST Act - Petitioner ...

March 23, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

Validity of demand with penalty u/s 73 of CGST Act - Petitioner argued that their detailed replies were not adequately considered, and they were not given an opportunity to clarify or provide further documents. The court found merit in these contentions, criticizing the proper officer for dismissing the petitioner's reply without proper assessment and for not providing opportunities for clarification. Consequently, the High court set aside the impugned order and directed the matter to be remitted for re-adjudication, emphasizing the importance of following principles of natural justice and affording parties due process.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of demand with penalty u/s 73 of CGST Act - Petitioner ...

March 23, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Validity of Conclusion of proceedings u/s 73 of the Central Good and Service Tax Act 2017 without considering the reply filed by the petitioner - The court noted that...

Validity of demand of service tax - The case involved appeals against an order regarding service tax demands and penalties. The Appellate Tribunal addressed multiple...

Violation of principles of natural justice - Validity of demand of GST with interest u/s 73 - the Delhi High Court addressed the petitioner's challenge against the order...

Validity of notice issued u/s 73 of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 challenged due to non-consideration of petitioner's reply, violating principles of natural...

Validity of Orders passed u/s 73 - excess claim of Input Tax Credit [ITC] - Inadequate Consideration of Replies - The Court noted that the Proper Officer appeared to...

Levy of Service Tax - leasing of the land of Kandla Port Trust - The show cause notice was issued only for demand of interest and penalty and there is no demand of...

The impugned order was passed without considering the reply filed by the petitioner and without affording an opportunity of personal hearing, despite a request being...

Petitioner challenged order u/s 73 of GST Act creating demand, as notices were uploaded on GST portal's 'Additional Notices and Orders' tab, unbeknownst to petitioner...

The High Court examined whether proper show cause notices were issued before passing impugned orders u/s 73(9) of the State GST Act. It held that the summary of show...

Demand without issue of show cause notice - Telephone services - Demand of differential tax u/s 73 - Best Judgement Assessment u/s 72 - demand set aside - AT

Quantum of levy of penalty - petitioner points out that 100% penalty was imposed although the show cause notice was issued u/s 73 - The High Court held that, it is clear...

Violation of principles of natural justice - impugned order does not take into consideration the reply submitted by the petitioner and is a cryptic order - The High...

Interest liability - delay in furnishing GSTR-3B return - Liability imposed without any adjudication proceeding u/s 73 or 74 - despite disputing the liability towards...

Demand of service tax by way of statement in lieu of Show cause notice (SCN)- demand-cum-penalty - section 73 (1A) of Finance Act, 1994 is not invokable and the...

Validity Of Order passed u/s 73 - cryptic order - The High Court found merit in the petitioner's arguments regarding the inadequacy of the impugned order. It observed...

Quick Updates: