Addition u/s 68 - Bogus LTCG - Penny stock transactions - The ...

Case Laws Income Tax

March 27, 2024

Addition u/s 68 - Bogus LTCG - Penny stock transactions - The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided sufficient documentary evidence supporting the genuineness of the transactions, including purchase and sale of shares through the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), payment through banking channels, and compliance with regulatory requirements (like STT). - ITAT noted that the AO primarily relied on a general report by the Kolkata Investigation wing and failed to connect the assessee or their transactions directly to any alleged manipulation of share prices. Additionally, SEBI did not find any wrongdoing on the part of the assessee or their broker. - Given the genuineness of the LTCG transactions was established, the Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition u/s 68 - Bogus LTCG - Penny stock transactions - The ...

Case Laws Income Tax

March 27, 2024

You may also like:

Addition u/s 68 - bogus LTCG - penny stock transaction - The ITAT observed that even though characteristics of penny stock transactions were present, there was no direct...

Addition made u/s 68 - Bogus LTCG - unexplained cash credits - suspicious transactions in shares - penny stock - The Tribunal ultimately upheld the AO's decision to...

The Tribunal held that the objection of the assessee regarding low tax effect was not sustainable. The addition made u/s 68 for bogus LTCG and unexplained cash credits...

Assessment u/s 153A - Addition u/s 68 - bogus LTCG - penny Stocks - whether documents found during the course of search were of incriminating nature? - The tribunal...

The Assessee, a regular investor in shares, made investments and sold a particular script when prices were high, resulting in Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG). The...

Bogus LTCG - Addition u/s 68 - bogus penny stock transaction - suspicion v/s facts - disallowing the exemption u/s 10(38) - The assessee has demonstrated with...

In this case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) examined the additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) regarding long-term capital gains (LTCG) from share...

Bogus LTCG on shares - Addition u/s 68 - Transactions in Shares - For making an addition holding that transaction are bogus, the LD AO should have made inquiries on the...

Bogus LTCG - exemption u/s 10(38) denied - The AO contended that the LTCG was undisclosed income arising from alleged manipulation in penny stocks. However, the assessee...

Bogus LTCG - addition u/s 68 - exemption of LTCG u/s 10(38) - penny stock - neither the assessee nor his broker are named as illegitimate beneficiary to bogus LTCG in...

Addition u/s 68 - bogus share transactions - as alleged transactions in shares, “penny stock” are fraudulent and accommodation entries - The Appellate Tribunal noted...

Bogus LTCG - Disallowance on claim of exemption u/s. 10(38) of LTCG - penny stock transactions - The price rise of the penny stock scrip was abrupt, sudden and...

Bogus long-term capital gains (LTCG) arising from sale of shares - AO held that the said LTCG/loss are fabricated/engineered transactions by the respective assessees,...

Addition u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE - Bogus LTCG - The Tribunal examined the transactions and found that the entire addition made by the Assessing Officer was based on...

The assessee received cash credits which were treated as unexplained income u/s 68 by the Assessing Officer (AO). However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)...

Quick Updates: