Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - ...

Case Laws Income Tax

May 9, 2024

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - Emphasizing the principles outlined by the Karnataka High Court, the Tribunal reaffirmed the importance of clear and specific grounds for imposing penalties under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. It clarified that penalties should only be imposed based on the grounds stated in the notice, and the validity of assessment cannot be a subject matter of penalty proceedings. The Tribunal agreed with the appellant's argument against the applicability of Section 292B to cure the defect in the notice under Section 274, reiterating that the notice did not conform to the intent and purpose of the Act.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - ...

Case Laws Income Tax

May 9, 2024

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice - non specification of charge - Assessing Officer has issued a vague and defective notice under section 274 r.w.s....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Mandation of specification of charge - It is clear that for the AO to assume jurisdiction u/s 271(1)(c), proper notice is necessary and the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - The notice u/s. 274 r.w.s. 271(l)(c) of the Act were issued without striking off the irrelevant portion of the limb...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice u/s 274 - The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for such notices to clearly delineate the charge against the assessee, allowing...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Non specification of charge - defective notice - as the A.O had clearly failed to discharge his statutory obligation of fairly putting the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - As a matter of fact the notice issued u/s 274 read with section 271 of the Act itself was ambiguous as it did not make it clear as to under which...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

The assessee challenged the penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) for short credit of sale consideration received from the sale of copyrights and cable rights. The issue...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - non specification of charge - new plea before the authorities below - In this case in hand, there is no such plea...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - in the assessment order, AO has made it clear that penalty proceedings are initiated separately for furnishing...

Notice u/s 271AAB to levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AO gets the jurisdiction to levy the penalty by issuing a notice and therefore, it is not a procedural requirement but...

Levy fo Penalty - AO failed to strike off either of the limbs of section 271(1)(c), which are not satisfied by the assessee and consequently, notice issued under section...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - failing to tick mark the limb or non-striking of second limb - The Court observed that such violation will not result...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defective notice u/s 274 - The notice does not delete the appropriate words and in the assessment order as well as in the penalty order, both...

Quick Updates: