Levy of penalty - non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill - ...

Case Laws GST

May 10, 2024

Levy of penalty - non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill - existence of mens rea or not The High Court referenced a specific case and highlighted that the issue of non-filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill was addressed in previous judgments. It emphasized that mere technical errors without intent to evade tax should not lead to penalties. It was reiterated that there was no evidence of mens rea or intent to evade tax on the petitioner's part. Thus, the imposition of penalty under Section 129(3) of the Act was deemed unjustified.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty - non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill - ...

Case Laws GST

May 10, 2024

You may also like:

Detention of goods on onward journey - detention on ground goods dispatched to different place than mentioned in documents - levy of penalty u/s 129 of UPGST Act -...

Levy of penalty u/s 129(3) - non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill - Referencing the judgment in M/s Citykart Retail Pvt. Ltd.'s case, the Court observed that the...

Levy of penalty - mens rea in evasion of tax - It is well settled that by merely using the expression “mens rea”, it would not amount to concluding that there was a...

Levy of penalty - there is no mens rea or any premediated thought in non-complying with the statutory requirements, as no duty was actually payable upon import, being...

Levy of penalty - Part B of E-Way Bills was not filled up - The High Court noted that, apart from the factual aspect that the Part B of E-Way Bills was not filled up,...

If there is no mens rea, no mandatory penalty u/s 11AC - SC

Levy of penalty u/s 54(1)(2) of the U.P. VAT Act, 2008 - men-rea - The Court concluded that mens rea is indeed an essential prerequisite for imposing a penalty under...

Levy of penalty - e-way bill had expired four days prior to the date of detention - existence of mens rea - The High Court found no evidence of intent to evade tax in...

Levy of penalty on Director u/r 26 of CER - involvement of the director of the appellants in clandestine activities or not - here are not much reasoning has been...

Detention of goods due to incomplete Part B of E-way bill. No dispute on documents/goods. Part B filled before notice/seizure order. No mens rea found to evade tax....

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Default by assessee - mens rea is not an essential element for imposing penalty for non compliance of notices issued by AO - penalty confirmed - AT

Levy of penalty - goods were unloaded at a place that was not registered in the registration certificate - unloading goods at a location not specified in the e-way bill...

Levy of penalty - at the time of detention was that one of the E-Way Bills had expired - The High court held that mens rea to evade tax is essential for imposing...

The High Court quashed penalty u/s E-Way Bill violation, classifying goods as ODC due to speed without intent to evade tax. Relying on precedent, mens rea is essential...

Quick Updates: