In the case before CESTAT Bangalore, the issue revolved around ...

CESTAT Bangalore held no mis-declaration in import value. Confiscation and penalty under section 112(a)(ii) set aside for 100% EOU engaged in software services.

Case Laws Customs

May 22, 2024

In the case before CESTAT Bangalore, the issue revolved around mis-declaration of import value, duty demand, confiscation of goods, and penalty imposition. The appellant, a 100% EOU providing software development services, imported a semi-conductor fabrication system. The appellant declared the value based on the supplier's proforma invoice, which was later found to be undervalued due to the goods being used. The Chartered Engineer enhanced the value, impacting the export obligation. The tribunal held that there was no intentional mis-declaration or suppression by the appellant, as the declared value was based on the proforma invoice. Consequently, the confiscation order and penalty imposed under section 112(a)(ii) were set aside.

View Source

← Previous Next →

In the case before CESTAT Bangalore, the issue revolved around ...

CESTAT Bangalore held no mis-declaration in import value. Confiscation and penalty under section 112(a)(ii) set aside for 100% EOU engaged in software services.

Case Laws Customs

May 22, 2024

You may also like:

The case pertains to the import of restricted goods, specifically marbles and mosaics, under the Import Policy at a value lower than the Minimum Import Price notified by...

Respondent issued show cause notice alleging import of prohibited goods. Petitioner replied and attended personal hearing. Impugned order did not discuss hazardous waste...

Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) case involving valuation of imported goods - rejection of declared value - enhancement of value. The tribunal...

The CESTAT examined the overvaluation of goods case involving rejection of declared export value, re-determination of value, confiscation of goods, and penalties. The...

Confiscation of goods and levy of penalty - Import of Pair of Shoes - mis-declaration/suppression in the import documents - Non-compliance of the provisions of the IPR...

Mis-declaration of value of imported goods - Since the appellants deliberately suppressed the value by mis-declaring, the goods were liable for confiscation. - AT

Confiscation - import of restricted items - rejection of value - as the importer had tried to import the restricted goods in violation of the provisions of the ITC(HS)...

The case pertains to the valuation of imported porcelain vitrified tiles. The key points are: The assessment attained finality, but the appellant has the legal right to...

This case deals with the valuation of 'rough diamonds' imported into India and the subsequent discrepancy between the declared value and the reassessed value by customs...

Valuation - Enhancement of value of the imported RPO - CESTAT held that, in the present case neither any contemporaneous value was adopted nor any method as prescribed...

Classification dispute involving imported SVPS Chillers - whether to be classified under CTH 84198940 or not, and eligibility for exemption notification dated 17.03.2012....

Valuation - rejection of transaction value of the import of “Lux” brand soaps declared by the appellant - Once misdeclaration of the value of import is established,...

The case pertains to the valuation and classification of imported goods as old and used second-hand goods or unused new goods. The key points are: The Chartered...

Confiscation of goods - Difference in actual quantity imported and as per Invoice / Bill of Entry - The importer is responsible for what he has imported and it is not...

Valuation of imported goods - Higher values available on contemporaneous imports NIDB/DGOV data on similar good - The valuation of similar goods depends on factors such...

Quick Updates: