The Karnataka High Court determined tax and penalty in a case ...

Transporter not required to carry original tax invoice, only duplicate copy as per Rule 48(1)(b) of CGST. Petition allowed.

Case Laws GST

May 30, 2024

The Karnataka High Court determined tax and penalty in a case where the original tax invoice was not carried during goods transportation. The court relied on a previous decision involving Rule 138-A of the SGST, Section 68 of the CGST, and Rule 48 of the CGST. It was held that as per Rule 48(1)(b) of the CGST, the transporter is only required to carry the duplicate copy, not the original tax invoice. The court rejected the contention that the petitioner should pay tax and penalty for not carrying the original invoice. The petitioner's claim for refund of double tax paid was accepted, and the petition was allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Karnataka High Court determined tax and penalty in a case ...

Transporter not required to carry original tax invoice, only duplicate copy as per Rule 48(1)(b) of CGST. Petition allowed.

Case Laws GST

May 30, 2024

You may also like:

Determining the tax and penalty - Vehicle transporting consignment without Original Tax Invoice - The High court analyzed the relevant provisions of the SGST Act and...

Liability of tax arising on account of inadvertent error - mismatch between the petitioner's GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B returns The High Court noted the certificates from...

Evasion of service tax - When original invoice is available in computer and not duplicate copy, then no addition can be made on the basis of extra printed copy - we find...

Rejection of rebate claim - original and duplicate copy of ARE1 for the goods exported not submitted - original and duplicate copy of ARE1 lost in transit - matter...

Cenvat credit - duty paying documents - debit note cum bills - duplicate copies of invoice - credit allowed - AT

Maintaining Duplicate copy of Invoice - Carbon copy or otherwise - When there is a specific mandate to maintain a duplicate it can only be with a carbon copy. Otherwise,...

Rebate claim – Non-submission of original and duplicate copy of ARE-1 under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 r.w Notification No. 19/2004 - rebate denied - CGOVT

Rebate claim is not admissible if the original and duplicate copy of ARE-1 is not submitted along with rebate claim. - CGOVT

Clandestine removal - Invoices pink coloured [Duplicate for transporter] are found in factory, hence, it can also be inferred logically that goods were not transported...

Documents to be carried by the transporter where e-bill is not required - he shall carry a copy of the tax invoice or the bill of supply issued in the absence of an...

Seeking rectification in Form GSTR-1 - limitation period - Works contract services - Input Tax Credit (“ITC”) - non-uploading of the invoices in GSTR-1 as B2B invoice -...

The case involved the determination of penalty u/s 69(1)(k) of the J&K Value Added Tax Act, 2005 for the issuance of 35 improper invoices on the same day. The High Court...

Denial of rebate claim - Bar of limitation - once the initial rebate claims filed within 1 year of date of export, although without original/duplicate copies of AREs-1...

Refund of unutilized CENVAT Credit - rejection of refund on the ground that credit was transferred to GST regime through TRAN-1 - it is not a case that the appellant has...

CENVAT Credit - Inability to produce original invoices - appellant has wrongly availed the CENVAT Credit without an invoice prescribed under Rule 9(1)(f) of the CENVAT...

Quick Updates: