Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2024 Year 2024 This

The Delhi High Court considered the addition u/s 68 and the ...


Evidentiary value of statements u/s 132(4): Statements alone not enough for assessment. Non-issuance of Notice u/s 153C cannot be rectified u/s 292B.

Case Laws     Income Tax

May 31, 2024

The Delhi High Court considered the addition u/s 68 and the evidentiary value of statements recorded u/s 132(4). The court emphasized that an assessment cannot be based solely on presumptions or statements without corroborating material. While statements are considered information, they must be supported by evidence found during a search for assessment. The court also discussed rectification u/s 292B, stating that jurisdictional defects cannot be cured under this section, rendering proceedings void. In this case, the Revenue failed to link seized material to the assessee group, leading to the assessment being set aside in favor of the assessee by the ITAT.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Statement recorded u/s 133A (3)(iii) is different than the statement recorded during search and seizure u/s 132(4), both have different evidentiary value

  2. Addition on account of income surrendered as per statement u/s 132(4) - though the statement recorded u/s 132(4) has a better evidentiary value but it is also a settled...

  3. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The High Court observed that, the expression “accommodation entry” and “bogus financial transaction” in the recorded reasons are not...

  4. Assessment u/s 153A - admission made u/s 132(4) - The fundamental difference between evidentiary value of statement under S. 132(4) against the maker of statement...

  5. Use of materials seized and the statement furnished by the third parties against the assessee - the opportunity for the rebuttal to the assessee for the seized documents...

  6. Addition based on survey proceeding - Unexplained stock of gold and silver jewellery - The statement given during the course of survey is not a statement on oath as...

  7. Addition based on retracted statement recorded on oath u/s 132(4)/133A - Statement taken even u/s 132(4) of the Act cannot be used as conclusive evidence if it is not...

  8. Validity of statement - retraction of statement - the statement recorded u/s. 132(4) cannot be discarded merely because the retractment statements were filed. The...

  9. Additions on the basis of statement made u/s 133A - whatever statement is recorded u/s 133A, it is not given any evidentiary value obviously for the reason that the...

  10. Addition based on statements recorded u/s. 132(4) - Effect of retraction of statements recorded u/s. 132(4) of the Act - Taxation of capitation fee alleged to have been...

  11. Scope and ambit of section 132(4) - Even in relation to the very block assessment, a statement referable to Section 132(4), but retracted by the person cannot constitute...

  12. Assessment u/s 153A - Addition made on account of disclosure of undisclosed income made u/s 132(4) - client code modifications for an unusually high number of times -...

  13. Voluntary admission u/s.132(4) - under invoicing of sales and unaccounted purchase of acid slurry - additions made on the basis of statement u/s 132(4) without having...

  14. Assessment u/s 153A - Deemed dividend addition u/s 2(22)(e) - whether the statement recorded during search u/s 132(4) of the Act or extracts of books of accounts...

  15. Assessment u/s 153A - Addition u/s 68 - bogus LTCG - Except the statement of the assessee u/s. 132(4) agreeing for the addition there is no seized incriminating material...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates