The ITAT Delhi considered the validity of a re-assessment order ...

Notice u/s 148 is not valid since not served as sent to wrong email ID. Limitation extended due to Covid-19.

Case Laws Income Tax

May 31, 2024

The ITAT Delhi considered the validity of a re-assessment order where no notice u/s 148 was served on the assessee. The notice u/s 148 was issued through the ITBA portal but sent to the wrong email ID. The tribunal held that the notice generated on 30.03.2021 was not served on the assessee as the email ID did not belong to them. The limitation for issuing the notice would have ended on 30.03.2020, extended to 31.03.2021 due to Covid-19. The AO issued the notice just one day before the extended deadline, but the revenue failed to prove its service. The decision favored the assessee due to the lack of proper service of the notice.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT Delhi considered the validity of a re-assessment order ...

Notice u/s 148 is not valid since not served as sent to wrong email ID. Limitation extended due to Covid-19.

Case Laws Income Tax

May 31, 2024

You may also like:

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - default servicing notice - notice served on the secondary email id registered with PAN - AO ought to have sent the notice u/s 148 to...

Notice u/s 148 send through registered post is presumed to be served

Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148A(b) to wrong Email ID - notices are sent to (i) email ids that are no longer in use (ii) email ids of...

Validity of reassessment order - Notice sent on wrong (old) E-mail ID - The petitioner company had two email addresses, one used until 2019 and another operational since...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - period of limitation extended to 16 years vide Finance Act, 2012- validity of notice for the period which has been expired already...

Validity of the assessment framed u/s 147 - Proof of service of notice - There was no valid service of notice u/s 148 of the Act in the present case. The finding of the...

Relaxation in adherence to prescribed timelines issued by SEBI due to Covid 19 - Circular

Preventive measures to be taken to contains the spread of Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) - Trade Notice

Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 barred by limitation - Though the notice u/s 148(2) was first published in the newspaper on 09.12.2017 which was beyond the...

Failure to service notice due to wrong email address - The assessee was not served notice due to wrong reference of email address, therefore, in our view the assessee...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - date of the issuance of the Notices - In the present case, the Notices were sent from the designated e-mail ID of the respective JAOs,...

The High Court held that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to issue a notice u/s 148 on 25 July 2022 for the assessment year 2013-14, as the limitation period...

SVLDRS - The court acknowledged that the petitioner failed to make the balance payment within the extended period due to financial constraints post-COVID-19. However, it...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Date of issuance of notice - communication in electronic form - Whether digitally signing notice would automatically amount to issuance...

Renewal of approval under proviso (ii) (b) to section 17 (2) (viii) - approval for providing treatment for Covid-19 patients - Since the show cause notice issued relies...

Quick Updates: