The ITAT Delhi held that the levy of penalty u/s 271D without ...

Levy of penalty u/s 271D without valid satisfaction recorded u/s 269SS - Penalty deleted for AY 2016-17 & 2017-18.

June 4, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT Delhi held that the levy of penalty u/s 271D without valid satisfaction for alleged violation u/s 269SS is not justified. The AO must record satisfaction in the assessment order u/s 143(3) to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271D. In this case, the AO failed to record satisfaction for penalty u/s 271D for the relevant assessment years. The tribunal referred to the case law of Jai Laxmi Rice Mills and concluded that penalty u/s 271D was not warranted. Consequently, the penalty imposed u/s 271D for both assessment years was deleted, and the appeals of the assessee were allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT Delhi held that the levy of penalty u/s 271D without ...

Levy of penalty u/s 271D without valid satisfaction recorded u/s 269SS - Penalty deleted for AY 2016-17 & 2017-18.

June 4, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The High Court held that for levying penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS, the Assessing Officer must record satisfaction that the provisions were violated....

The ITAT held that for penalty u/s 271D for contravention of section 269SS, recording satisfaction by AO is mandatory. Citing Jaya Laxmi Rice Mills case, it emphasized...

Penalty u/s 271D - violation of provisions u/s 269SS - cash receipt claimed as advance against sales - recording of the satisfaction by the AO is sine qua non for...

Penalty levied u/s 271D for contravention of Section 269SS, which restricts cash transactions above a specified sum for immovable property. The key points are: The...

HC ruled penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E require explicit satisfaction to be recorded by Assessing Officer during reassessment. Mere recording of...

Penalty u/s 271D - violation of provisions of section 269SS - AO has not at all recorded his satisfaction that the assessee has contravened the provisions of section...

Penalty u/s 271D - default of provisions of section 269SS - recording of satisfaction - since the assessment order as well as the order of the JCIT are devoid of any...

Levy of penalties u/s 271D and 271E for the violation of sections 269SS and 269T, respectively - The Tribunal, after reviewing precedents from the Supreme Court and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271D - contravention of provisions of section 269SS - the AO initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) and there is no satisfaction recorded...

Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - Addition of LTCG - Assessing Officer while recording satisfaction has invoked both the charges of section 271(1)(c) - ambiguity and...

Penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS was challenged. ITAT held that where assessee received sale consideration for immovable property in cash exceeding Rs....

Validity of Penalty u/s 271D and u/s 271E - Penalty proceeding as independent of the assessment proceeding - absence of satisfaction recorded in the reassessment u/s 147...

Levy of penalty u/ss 271D and 271E was challenged - default u/ss 269SS and 269T - assessee received and repaid cash loans from directors and related concerns - assessee...

Penalty levied u/s 271D - assessee has availed cash loan in contravention of provision of section 269SS - Assessee has submitted that though the assessee has initially...

Quick Updates: