CESTAT Mumbai addressed a case involving a differential Central ...

Differential Central Excise duty demand u/s 11A(4) not sustainable. Extended period of limitation not invokable. Penalty set aside.

Case Laws Central Excise

June 5, 2024

CESTAT Mumbai addressed a case involving a differential Central Excise duty demand u/s 11A(4) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant discharged the duty upon obtaining CAS-4 certificates showing actual values of intermediate goods. The tribunal found the duty demand unsustainable as the appellant had paid duty based on available records and later adjusted it upon determining actual costs. The department's proposed addition to base cost was deemed insufficient to invoke Section 11A(4). The tribunal also ruled that the extended limitation period couldn't be applied for clearances to other units. Penalties u/s 11AC (1)(a) and u/r 25(1)(a) were deemed unjustified. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

CESTAT Mumbai addressed a case involving a differential Central ...

Differential Central Excise duty demand u/s 11A(4) not sustainable. Extended period of limitation not invokable. Penalty set aside.

Case Laws Central Excise

June 5, 2024

You may also like:

Demand of differential Central Excise Duty with interest and penalty - inflating freight charges through their dummy transport unit - The Tribunal affirmed the...

Method of Valuation - section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944 or section 4A of Central Excise Act, 1944 - packages of cake mixes manufactured having been affixed with...

Extended period of limitation - Valuation of goods - The Appellant has to charge full amount of AVAT and it cannot charge 1% in the invoices as per the provision of AVAT...

100% EOU - extended period of limitation - while demanding duty was not sure of the provision of law under which the same had to be demanded and even the penalty has...

Interest on differential duty by invoking extended period of limitation - Invoking the extending period of limitation is not sustainable and the demand of interest by...

MRP based valuation u/s 4A or transaction value u/s 4 - When no show-cause notice has been served no duty can be demanded under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act,...

This case deals with the applicability of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED) levied u/s 147 of the Finance Act, 2002, and Additional Duty of Excise (AED) levied as...

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

Demand of interest on differential duty - finalization of provisional assessment - rule 7(4) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 read with section 11AA of Central Excise Act,...

Extended period of limitation - Method of Valuation - section 4 or section 4A of Central Excise Act or not - there cannot be any reason to hold in the instant case that...

Refund of excess payment of duty - Sale of goods through depot - Valuation - The duty is payable in accordance with the Section 4 of Central Excise Valuation Rules ,...

Method of Valuation - prototype vehicles - goods cleared from the factory on payment of duty under self invoice on the comparable value of the similar vehicle applying...

Price variation clause - applicability of period of limitation on demand of Interest under central excise - AT

The appellant paid excise duty on the removal of inputs as such, based on the transaction value. However, this excise duty was found to be in excess of the actual CENVAT...

Levy of interest on the differential duty paid during the relevant period - extended period of limitation - With regard to applicability of period of limitation for...

Quick Updates: