In a case before the High Court, the issue was whether de-oiled ...

Revision dismissed as substantial question of law already answered by Supreme Court. De-oiled items used as animal-food exempt from tax.

June 5, 2024

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

In a case before the High Court, the issue was whether de-oiled items used as animal-food, cattle-food, poultry-food, and fish-food are exempt goods. The Doctrine of Ejusdem generis was not considered. The revisionist argued that paddy husk is not covered by the relevant entry and is not exempt. The Court held that the question was already answered by the Supreme Court in a previous case where it was established that certain by-products, including de-oiled items, are exempt under the VAT Act. Since the legal issue was settled u/s the Supreme Court decision, the revision was dismissed at the admission stage.

View Source

← Previous Next →

In a case before the High Court, the issue was whether de-oiled ...

Revision dismissed as substantial question of law already answered by Supreme Court. De-oiled items used as animal-food exempt from tax.

June 5, 2024

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

You may also like:

The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of short-term loss claimed by the assessee in the Profit and Loss Account, holding that the shares were acquired under a normal...

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the assessing officer against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, holding that no substantial question of law...

Jurisdiction of civil court u/s 34 of SARFAESI Act was in question. Suit for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction was rejected by lower courts under Order...

Substantial question of law to be made out u/s 260A or not? - Undisclosed income surrendered during the Search and Seizure action - to be taxed at normal rate or tax...

The case pertains to additions made by the Assessing Officer on account of bogus share application money and commission for bogus accommodation entries. The ITAT deleted...

Substantial question of law to be made u/s 260A - prerequisite of admission of the appeal before the High court - The ITAT hold that the assessee had correctly offered...

Addition u/s 68 - substantial question of law - The Supreme court has held that, the jurisdiction of the High Court to interfere with the orders passed by the Courts...

The Supreme Court held that the High Court should formulate the second substantial question of law proposed by the Revenue regarding whether violation of conditions u/s...

Seizure of goods as smuggled into the country from Myanmar u/s 130 of the Customs Act, 1962. The burden of proof lies on the respondent u/s 123 to show that the seized...

Deposits made by assessee in Krishi Bank were fixed deposit investments, not trading activity. Loss suffered when bank went into liquidation is capital loss, not...

Revision u/s 263 challenged for lack of proper inquiry by Assessing Officer regarding cash deposits during demonetization, scrap sales, and non-submission of audit...

The court upheld the Tribunal's order dismissing the appeals, as it aligned with the Division Bench's decision in Tarajyoth Polymers Ltd. case, where the retrospective...

The HC dismissed the appeal, holding that no substantial question of law arose from the ITAT's order. The ITAT had allowed the assessee's claim for benefits u/ss 11 and...

Validity of the decision High Court deciding the appeal on admission state itself on merit - The Supreme Court observed that while the High Court had framed certain...

TPA - comparable selection - substantial question of law - the Revenue has routinely brought such matters before this Court knowing fully well that the Transfer Pricing...

Quick Updates: